凯文·马拉尼为创新型高科技企业处理各类知识产权(IP)事务,专注于此类问题的诉讼前咨询及诉讼相关事务。
Kevin counsels clients in pre-litigation issues involved in IP enforcement and clearance through risk-assessment, agreement review, and due diligence. He assists his clients with respect to a wide variety of IP assets and disputes including patents, trade secrets, trademarks, and other IP disputes.
Kevin’s case experience spans many diverse technologies with a primary focus on computer software and hardware disputes. Exemplary technologies include process control software, building control and security software systems, smartphone applications, VoIP, communication standards such as 802.11, biometric encryption and decryption, and media content delivery applications. Through this experience, Kevin has handled cases involving standards-setting organizations as well as parallel U.S. Patent and Trademark Office proceedings.
Prior to law school, Kevin was a software engineer at Oracle Corporation, where he designed and implemented complex software applications for aggregating, presenting, and analyzing large data sets. A self-described “source code expert functioning as an attorney,” clients appreciate Kevin’s informed counsel, which provides valuable insight into hardware and software issues that arise with products on the market.
Kevin is a member of the Intellectual Property Litigation Practice Group and the Innovative Technology Sector.
附属机构
- 美国律师协会会员
- 威斯康星州律师协会会员
- Member of the Wisconsin Intellectual Property Law Association
社区参与
- Milwaukee Academy of Science (MAS)
- Member of the board of directors
- Member of the Executive Committee
- Chair of the Fund Development Committee
- Member of the Fundraising Cabinet for the “I Have a Dream” Foundation Milwaukee
- ACTS Housing/ACTS Lending
- Former member of the board of directors
- Former chair of the Lending Advisory Committee
- Pro bono work for MAS, ACTS Housing/ACTS Lending, Legal Aid Society of Milwaukee, and Lawyers for the Creative Arts
美国专利商标局和地方法院的 Alice 专利资格分析分歧:联邦巡回法院澄清在§ 101资格争议中依赖美国专利商标局裁定的限制
福里律师事务所探讨爱丽丝专利适格性分析分歧
美国专利商标局和地方法院对爱丽丝专利资格分析的分歧