Stephen Thaler’s quest to have patent offices throughout the world recognize AI agents as inventors is thwarted again, this time by the UK’s Supreme Court. The court rejected Thaler’s claims and held that an inventor must be a natural person, in line with other jurisdictions that have ruled on this issue.
[Thaler’s] attempt to register the patents was refused by Britain’s Intellectual Property Office on the grounds that the inventor must be a human or a company, rather than a machine. Thaler appealed to the UK’s Supreme Court, which on Wednesday unanimously rejected his appeal as under UK patent law “an inventor must be a natural person”.
View referenced article

Author(s)
Related Insights
January 6, 2026
Foley Viewpoints
Shifting Enforcement Priorities at the CFTC and the SEC
Under the new administration, priorities have shifted at the Commodity Futures Trading Commission and the Securities and Exchange Commission, particularly with the enforcement divisions at both agencies — which had faced widespread internal and external criticism. Both the CFTC and SEC are undergoing structural changes as a shift away from regulation through enforcement. This article discusses these developments in detail.
January 5, 2026
Foley Viewpoints
Fred Ridley showcased in Sports Business Journal’s “The 125 Most Influential in Sports Business of the Past 25 Years
Fred Ridley took over as chairman of Augusta National Golf Club in the fall of 2017, and in those short eight years, he has enacted…
December 24, 2025
Tariff & International Trade Resource
What Every Multinational Should Know About … Preserving the Right to IEEPA Tariff Refunds (Updated with FAQs)
Any company that has imported goods subject to the Trump administration’s fentanyl-based tariffs or reciprocal tariffs — i.e., the tariffs levied pursuant to the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (the IEEPA tariffs) — needs to consider filing an action in the U.S. Court of International Trade (CIT) to preserve the possibility of recovering refunds of these tariffs.