Lacktman, Wein Quoted in mHealthIntelligence About OIG’s Approval of Free SmartPhone Giveaway for Medication Adherence Tracking
February 5, 2019
mHealthIntelligence
Partner Nate Lacktman and Of Counsel Emily Wein were quoted in the mHealthIntelligence article, “OIG Oks Free Phones in mHealth Project Targeting Medication Adherence,” about the Office of the Inspector General decision to approve a digital health care company’s plan to loan free smartphones to patients enrolled in a project tracking medication adherence. The OIG last month ruled in favor of the digital health company’s plans which gives phones to patients enrolled in a digital therapeutic program in which they track medication adherence through an ingestible sensor and corresponding mobile health platform. This is the sixth time that the OIG has approved a projects like this.
Lacktman and Wein said the OIG ruled that the program did not violate anti-kickback laws for numerous reasons and also noted that the OIG’s ruling is specific to the case, but it points to support by the federal government for programs that improve access to care and health outcomes.
“OIG included its traditional disclaimer that the advisory opinion can only be relied upon by the specific company that requested it, and the opinion would be null if any material facts were not disclosed,” they wrote. “Companies offering similar digital health therapeutics or remote patient monitoring programs should closely review the opinion because it offers insight into the government’s view on how technology can promote access to care. Companies evaluating or developing similar programs offering free or discounted technology should carefully consider the safeguards enumerated in OIG’s analysis prior to launch.”
Lacktman and Wein said the OIG ruled that the program did not violate anti-kickback laws for numerous reasons and also noted that the OIG’s ruling is specific to the case, but it points to support by the federal government for programs that improve access to care and health outcomes.
“OIG included its traditional disclaimer that the advisory opinion can only be relied upon by the specific company that requested it, and the opinion would be null if any material facts were not disclosed,” they wrote. “Companies offering similar digital health therapeutics or remote patient monitoring programs should closely review the opinion because it offers insight into the government’s view on how technology can promote access to care. Companies evaluating or developing similar programs offering free or discounted technology should carefully consider the safeguards enumerated in OIG’s analysis prior to launch.”
People
Related News
December 3, 2025
In the News
Vanessa Miller Assesses Automotive Tariff Impact on Trucking Industry
Foley & Lardner LLP partner Vanessa Miller discussed the ongoing disruption in trucking demand resulting from recent automotive tariffs in the TruckingDive article, “Tariffs swing volumes up and down for auto haulers.”
November 28, 2025
In the News
Cassandra Aubert Assesses Circuit Split on SEC Disgorgement Authority
Foley & Lardner LLP associate Cassandra Aubert commented on the growing scrutiny around the U.S. Security and Exchange Commission's disgorgement authority in the Bloomberg Law's article, “SEC Power to Recoup Illegal Profits at Risk as Justices Eye Case."
November 25, 2025
In the News
Gregory Husisian Analyzes SCOTUS Tariff Case
Foley & Lardner LLP partner Gregory Husisian appeared in a SupplyChainBrain video interview to discuss the U.S. Supreme Court case on the Trump administration’s imposition of tariffs under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) and options the administration can consider should the court strike them down.