Lacktman Comments on Shortcomings of Some Telemedicine Reimbursement Laws
October 17, 2017
Bloomberg BNA Health Care Daily Report
Partner Nathaniel Lacktman was quoted in a Bloomberg BNA Health Care Daily Report article, “Telemedicine Reimbursement Laws Challenge Insurers and Providers Alike,” about well-intentioned but poorly drafted state telemedicine coverage laws.
Lacktman said such laws can suffer from a statutory drafting process that doesn’t always achieve what lawmakers set out to do.
“Lawyers can do to language what a steam table will do to vegetables,” he said, adding that the final versions of such laws are sometimes “so wilted that it simply confuses and frustrates health-care providers because they don’t actually offer meaningful coverage or payment parity.”
Lacktman said such laws can suffer from a statutory drafting process that doesn’t always achieve what lawmakers set out to do.
“Lawyers can do to language what a steam table will do to vegetables,” he said, adding that the final versions of such laws are sometimes “so wilted that it simply confuses and frustrates health-care providers because they don’t actually offer meaningful coverage or payment parity.”
People
Related News
December 3, 2025
In the News
Vanessa Miller Assesses Automotive Tariff Impact on Trucking Industry
Foley & Lardner LLP partner Vanessa Miller discussed the ongoing disruption in trucking demand resulting from recent automotive tariffs in the TruckingDive article, “Tariffs swing volumes up and down for auto haulers.”
November 28, 2025
In the News
Cassandra Aubert Assesses Circuit Split on SEC Disgorgement Authority
Foley & Lardner LLP associate Cassandra Aubert commented on the growing scrutiny around the U.S. Security and Exchange Commission's disgorgement authority in the Bloomberg Law's article, “SEC Power to Recoup Illegal Profits at Risk as Justices Eye Case."
November 25, 2025
In the News
Gregory Husisian Analyzes SCOTUS Tariff Case
Foley & Lardner LLP partner Gregory Husisian appeared in a SupplyChainBrain video interview to discuss the U.S. Supreme Court case on the Trump administration’s imposition of tariffs under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) and options the administration can consider should the court strike them down.