Complying with Consumer Product Advertising and Labeling Regulations and Other Requirements
July 19, 2023

Jai Singh is a partner and co-chair of Foley’s Consumer Products Team, as well as the vice chair of the firm’s Consumer Law and Class Action Practice Group. He routinely counsels consumer product clients on forming effective and compliant advertising and marketing strategies. In this video, Jai discusses three ways to achieve compliant advertising, including substantiating claims, avoiding deceptive claims, and complying with applicable regulations.
Key Takeaways
- An advertisement, for legal purposes, is a very broad term that covers almost all consumer facing statements and representations made in a wide array of places, including product labels, webpages, print media, brochures, and even product instructions and manuals.
- The goal of advertising counseling is to have a consumer product with compliant marketing claims and other messaging or statements made to consumers.
- All objective advertising must be substantiated. That is, there must be a reasonable basis for the claim or representation. The level of substantiation varies depending on three things:
- The type of claim being made;
- The support required for the claim; and,
- The manner in which the claim is being conveyed to consumers.
- The claim cannot be deceptive or misleading, which is measured by an objective reasonable consumer standard.
- The claim has to comply with any applicable rule or regulation. This assessment usually involves having knowledge and experience with the regulations and guidance issued by the FTC, the FDA, the NAD, or State Attorneys General.
- Preventative counseling also involves having an understanding of current litigation trends and asserted theories of liability in false advertising cases.
- Having compliant advertising mitigates the threat of consumer class actions, competitor actions, and public enforcement actions.
Disclaimer
This blog is made available by Foley & Lardner LLP (“Foley” or “the Firm”) for informational purposes only. It is not meant to convey the Firm’s legal position on behalf of any client, nor is it intended to convey specific legal advice. Any opinions expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the views of Foley & Lardner LLP, its partners, or its clients. Accordingly, do not act upon this information without seeking counsel from a licensed attorney. This blog is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Communicating with Foley through this website by email, blog post, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship for any legal matter. Therefore, any communication or material you transmit to Foley through this blog, whether by email, blog post or any other manner, will not be treated as confidential or proprietary. The information on this blog is published “AS IS” and is not guaranteed to be complete, accurate, and or up-to-date. Foley makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, as to the operation or content of the site. Foley expressly disclaims all other guarantees, warranties, conditions and representations of any kind, either express or implied, whether arising under any statute, law, commercial use or otherwise, including implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Foley or any of its partners, officers, employees, agents or affiliates be liable, directly or indirectly, under any theory of law (contract, tort, negligence or otherwise), to you or anyone else, for any claims, losses or damages, direct, indirect special, incidental, punitive or consequential, resulting from or occasioned by the creation, use of or reliance on this site (including information and other content) or any third party websites or the information, resources or material accessed through any such websites. In some jurisdictions, the contents of this blog may be considered Attorney Advertising. If applicable, please note that prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Photographs are for dramatization purposes only and may include models. Likenesses do not necessarily imply current client, partnership or employee status.
Author(s)
Related Insights
July 14, 2025
Labor & Employment Law Perspectives
Delaware Court Confronts Issue of First Impression: When a Company Attempts to Enforce a Noncompete Seeking Only Damages, Does the Same Reasonableness Analysis Apply?
In Fortiline, Inc. v. McCall, the plaintiffs sought to enforce a noncompetition agreement against its former employees through a…
July 14, 2025
Labor & Employment Law Perspectives
State Sick Leave Changes; No Sign of Slowing
As 2025 continues, the state sick leave law landscape continues to change posing ongoing challenges for multi-state employers. On July…
July 14, 2025
Labor & Employment Law Perspectives
Surprises Await Employers in One Big Beautiful Bill
As has been widely reported in the general media, on July 4, 2025, in a White House ceremony that included a flyover by B-2 Stealth…