As the first of a three-part series, partners David Ralston and Frank Murray published a Thomson Reuters Practical Law practice note, “Government Contracts: GAO Bid Protests,” which ran on January 3, 2017.
As prefaced in the article, the practice note describes the United States Government Accountability Office (GAO) bid protests that were filed by unhappy potential bidders, and discusses the benefits and disadvantages of GAO bid protests, compared to those with the United States Court of Federal Claims and at the agency level.
Read the full article through the below PDF.
As prefaced in the article, the practice note describes the United States Government Accountability Office (GAO) bid protests that were filed by unhappy potential bidders, and discusses the benefits and disadvantages of GAO bid protests, compared to those with the United States Court of Federal Claims and at the agency level.
Read the full article through the below PDF.
Author(s)
Related Insights
May 27, 2025
Foley Ignite
Lost in Translation: Key Deal Points in European vs. U.S. M&A Transactions
After two decades practicing law in Silicon Valley and five formative years working on cross-border deals in Europe, I've come to…
May 27, 2025
Innovative Technology Insights
Another FCA Cybersecurity Settlement Reinforces the Enforcement Trend
A recent United States Department of Justice announcement highlights the fact that the government’s emphasis on cybersecurity enforcement under the False Claims Act is not slowing down.
May 27, 2025
Labor & Employment Law Perspectives
It’s Time Again for Employers to File Their EEO-1 Reports
This is a reminder that the 2024 EEO-1 Component 1 data collection opened on Tuesday, May 20, 2025. All employers who have at least 100…