Today, in Ass’n for Molecular Pathology v. Myriad Genetics, Inc., No. 2010-1406 (Fed. Cir. 2012), the Federal Circuit held that non-naturally occurring DNA is patent eligible as well as the use of a transformed, non-naturally occurring cell for screening drug candidates. Myriad’s method claims directed to “comparing” or “analyzing” DNA sequences were held to be patent-ineligible. A copy of the Federal Circuit’s decision is attached Federal Circuit Myriad Decision. A detailed analysis by Foley & Lardner, LLP and this blog post will follow.
Related Insights
May 27, 2025
Foley Ignite
Lost in Translation: Key Deal Points in European vs. U.S. M&A Transactions
After two decades practicing law in Silicon Valley and five formative years working on cross-border deals in Europe, I've come to…
May 27, 2025
Innovative Technology Insights
Another FCA Cybersecurity Settlement Reinforces the Enforcement Trend
A recent United States Department of Justice announcement highlights the fact that the government’s emphasis on cybersecurity enforcement under the False Claims Act is not slowing down.
May 27, 2025
Labor & Employment Law Perspectives
It’s Time Again for Employers to File Their EEO-1 Reports
This is a reminder that the 2024 EEO-1 Component 1 data collection opened on Tuesday, May 20, 2025. All employers who have at least 100…