Finding Synergy: How KSR v. Teleflex Will Affect Patent Prosecution in the Electrical and Mechanical Arts
August 26, 2008
In KSR International Co. v. Telejlex Inc, the Supreme Court held that the test for obviousness used by the Federal Circuit was inconsistent with 35 U.S.C. §103 and Supreme Court precedent. Specifically, the Court held that the Federal Circuit gave too much weight to the “teaching, suggestion and motivation” test (TSM) which requires a specific finding of some motivation, teaching, or suggestion to combine prior art teachings in the particular manner claimed before a claim may be found invalid.
Read the complete article by clicking on the link below.
Related Insights
June 23, 2025
Labor & Employment Law Perspectives
First Circuit Concludes Employee’s Wrongful Termination, Other State Law Claims are Preempted by Federal Law
The U.S Court of Appeals for the First Circuit (covering Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Puerto Rico, and Rhode Island) recently…
June 4, 2025
Events
Selecting the Right Trustee and Role of Trust Protectors within the Trust World
June 20, 2025
Events
Wealthyist E25 | Philanthropy Trends: An Interview With Jason Kohout, Chair – Family Offices Team, Foley & Lardner
Jason Kohout, Chair of the Family Office area at Foley and Lardner and director of the Wisconsin Philanthropy Network joins Annex Private Client Wealth Strategist Brian Lamborne in episode 25 of “Wealthyist.”