By now, it is well-known that fights over virtual goods can have real-world consequences. In 2005, for example, one Chinese gamer killed another over a stolen dragon saber. Virtual world goods can also translate into real world profits — 2006 saw the first millionaire of the popular virtual world Second Life, Anshe Chung, who accumulated more than one million dollars in virtual world assets. As real as the effects of virtual products are, one wonders whether the property entitlements that might attach to them are secure. In particular, if the operator of a virtual world wanted to shut the world down, and by so doing destroy all of the products contained therein, would users have right to stop it?
Related Insights
June 20, 2025
Foley Career Perspectives
Foley Juneteenth Program: Exploring the Hidden History to Further Our Mutual Understanding
In celebration of Juneteenth, Foley & Lardner welcomed Dr. Deirdre Cooper Owens, author and historian, for a firmwide virtual program on…
July 10, 2025
Events
Mandatory Roth Catch-up
Join Foley’s upcoming webinar on mandatory Roth catch-up contributions effective January 1, 2026. Learn how the new rules impact high earners, what guidance exists, and practical tips for plan compliance.
June 20, 2025
Foley Viewpoints
Federal Court Enjoins Former Franchisees and Two Related Entities from Competing Against Franchisor
A federal court recently granted in part and denied in part a franchisor’s motion to enjoin the post-termination activities of its former…