Ethics Drama of 2007: Qualcomm, Congress and the Pressure to Waive Attorney Client Privilege
December 4, 2007
The patent infringement lawsuit of Qualcomm v. Broadcom began innocuously and ended with a court order finding the plaintiff and its counsel knowingly violated a duty to disclosure, honesty, and good faith. The court found that conduct constituting discovery abuse exposed counsel to career imperiling orders, and the company to millions of dollars in sanctions. The company and its outside counsel each hired separate counsel, and in the resulting sanctions hearing attorney client privilege was threatened. Key leaders for Qualcomm including their General Counsel resigned. This session, presented by Kenneth S. Klein, Foley & Lardner LLP, explored how events came to this juncture, and what lessons can be learned to avoid it happening again.
Related Insights
December 19, 2025
Foley Viewpoints
President Trump’s Executive Order: Increasing Medical Marijuana
On December 18, 2025, President Donald Trump issued an Executive Order, Increasing Medical Marijuana and Cannabidiol Research, that…
December 18, 2025
Manufacturing Industry Advisor
Foley Automotive Update
Analysis by Julie Dautermann, Competitive Intelligence Analyst Foley is here to help you through all aspects of rethinking your long-term…
December 18, 2025
Innovative Technology Insights
Data Centers: The Role of AI and Semiconductors in Transforming an Industry
Data Centers: The Role of AI and Semiconductors in Transforming an Industry Key Takeaways AI is driving unprecedented demand for data…