Brinckerhoff Discusses Recent Federal Circuit Decision on Biosimilar with Bloomberg Law
December 15, 2017
Bloomberg Law Patent, Trademark & Copyright Journal – Daily Edition
Partner Courtenay Brinckerhoff was quoted in a Bloomberg Law Patent, Trademark & Copyright Journal – Daily Edition article, “Biosimilars Statute Trumps State Law, Appeals Court Rules,” about a recent U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ruling on the Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act.
The court, in a December 14, 2017, ruling, held that the statute, which provides a relatively quick path for biosimilar makers to get new drug products to market, supersedes state law claims. The ruling was the second big win for biosimilar applicants this year. Earlier the U.S. Supreme Court allowed a biosimilar applicant to skip a notice period to a biologic owner before marketing its biosimilar product.
“The decision favors biosimilar applicants in that it forecloses a state law remedy for failing to comply with the BPCIA information exchange procedures, and thereby confirms that doing so is completely optional,” Brinckerhoff said. “Since the field of biosimilar litigation is relatively new, the decision does not upset any long-settled practices, although existing cases may include similar state law claims that may not survive this decision.”
The court, in a December 14, 2017, ruling, held that the statute, which provides a relatively quick path for biosimilar makers to get new drug products to market, supersedes state law claims. The ruling was the second big win for biosimilar applicants this year. Earlier the U.S. Supreme Court allowed a biosimilar applicant to skip a notice period to a biologic owner before marketing its biosimilar product.
“The decision favors biosimilar applicants in that it forecloses a state law remedy for failing to comply with the BPCIA information exchange procedures, and thereby confirms that doing so is completely optional,” Brinckerhoff said. “Since the field of biosimilar litigation is relatively new, the decision does not upset any long-settled practices, although existing cases may include similar state law claims that may not survive this decision.”
People
Related News
July 7, 2025
In the News
Louis Lehot Assesses Deal Trends in Shifting Market
Foley & Lardner LLP partner Louis Lehot assessed dealmaking trends in the Law360 article, "PE Dealmakers Best-Suited To Cut Through M&A Challenges."
July 3, 2025
In the News
Christopher Swift Assesses CFIUS Involvement in Telecommunications Acquisition
Foley & Lardner LLP partner Christopher Swift shared insight on the Committe on Foreign Investment in the United States’ (CFIUS) involvement in a telecommunications transaction in The Capitol Forum article, “T-Mobile/UScellular: Team Telecom’s Deference Gives DOJ, FCC Flexibility to Penalize Buyer If It Violates Agreement.”
July 3, 2025
In the News
Louis Lehot Highlights Opportunities and Challenges for M&A Market
Foley & Lardner LLP partner Louis Lehot highlighted opportunities and challenges for the M&A market in the Law360 article, "Mid-Year M&A Deal Flow Suffers Amid Global Instability."