States and Feds Moving to Block Employer Access to Social Media

16 April 2012 Labor & Employment Law Perspectives Blog
Authors: John F. Birmingham Jr

Employers are increasing the review of applicants’ social media sites as part of their standard hiring processes. A 2009 poll revealed that as many as 45 percent of employers regularly screen applicants through social media sites such as Facebook and Twitter, and many of these employers have declined to hire candidates because the sites contained provocative or inappropriate photographs, drinking or drug use, negative comments about prior employers, discriminatory comments, and so forth. While laws like the Electronic Communications Privacy Act require permission to access sites and government organizations such as the NLRB have policed discipline based upon social media activity, no state has banned the review of applicants’ social media sites until now.

On April 9, 2012, in response to protests from organizations ranging from Facebook itself to the ACLU, Maryland became the first state to prohibit an employer from asking applicants and employees for their passwords to access their social media sites. The Act also prohibits discipline for refusing to provide the passwords. Legislators in Washington, New Jersey, and California also have introduced similar bills. At the federal level, two congressmen have proposed legislation and Senators Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) and Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.) have asked the EEOC and U.S. Department of Justice to address this issue.

Employers — both those who believe they can learn valuable, unvarnished information about applicants through social media and those who review such sites to protect trade secrets or prevent sexual harassment — are set to clash with the government and its efforts to protect privacy. As social media has become a dominant method of communication, particularly for younger applicants and employees, expect this area to be a battleground for these competing interests.

Maryland has spoken, but other states have no blanket ban that precludes the review of social media sites in selecting employees. However, in addition to applying this screening tool in a consistent, non-discriminatory fashion and obtaining permission from applicants and employees before accessing the social media sites, prudent employers constantly must keep apprised of legislative and regulatory changes in different jurisdictions that restrain or ban the practice.

This blog is made available by Foley & Lardner LLP (“Foley” or “the Firm”) for informational purposes only. It is not meant to convey the Firm’s legal position on behalf of any client, nor is it intended to convey specific legal advice. Any opinions expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the views of Foley & Lardner LLP, its partners, or its clients. Accordingly, do not act upon this information without seeking counsel from a licensed attorney. This blog is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Communicating with Foley through this website by email, blog post, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship for any legal matter. Therefore, any communication or material you transmit to Foley through this blog, whether by email, blog post or any other manner, will not be treated as confidential or proprietary. The information on this blog is published “AS IS” and is not guaranteed to be complete, accurate, and or up-to-date. Foley makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, as to the operation or content of the site. Foley expressly disclaims all other guarantees, warranties, conditions and representations of any kind, either express or implied, whether arising under any statute, law, commercial use or otherwise, including implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Foley or any of its partners, officers, employees, agents or affiliates be liable, directly or indirectly, under any theory of law (contract, tort, negligence or otherwise), to you or anyone else, for any claims, losses or damages, direct, indirect special, incidental, punitive or consequential, resulting from or occasioned by the creation, use of or reliance on this site (including information and other content) or any third party websites or the information, resources or material accessed through any such websites. In some jurisdictions, the contents of this blog may be considered Attorney Advertising. If applicable, please note that prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Photographs are for dramatization purposes only and may include models. Likenesses do not necessarily imply current client, partnership or employee status.

Related Services