Asset Acquisition Comes With Unexpected FLSA Pain

08 April 2013 Labor & Employment Law Perspectives Blog

Some bargains are not as they seem. An asset-acquiring Company discovered this the hard way in Teed v. Thomas & Betts Power Solutions. In the case, at an auction, Thomas & Betts purchased the assets of a company in receivership. It knew that a judgment of $500,000 had been entered against the former company in a lawsuit under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). Therefore, it made the purchase contingent upon the express condition that it be “free and clear of all liabilities.” Under (Wisconsin) state law, that, in combination with the common law principle that an asset purchaser generally does not assume liabilities, would have protected Thomas & Betts.

However, as the Seventh Circuit United States Court of Appeals recognized, federal law is different. The Court concluded that under federal labor law “the imposition of successor liability will often be necessary to achieve the statutory goals because the workers will often be unable to head off a corporate sale by the employer aimed at extinguishing the employer’s liability to them.” Therefore, the Court held that the purchaser of assets will be liable as a successor under federal labor and employment statutes “unless there are good reasons to withhold such liability.” Good reasons include lack of notice of the liability, the predecessor’s ability to pay the judgment, and a lack of continuity between the companies’ operations, but each of these factors supported liability in this case. The court also suggested that successor liability may not be appropriate if the predecessor was insolvent and the FLSA plaintiffs were trying to reprioritize the preferences to jump ahead in line or were otherwise trying to manipulate the bankruptcy process in a way that would scare off potential buyers. The Court considered, but rejected, these potential reasons in finding Thomas & Betts liable.

So, all of the practice points flowing from this decision fall under the ancient maxim “let the buyer beware”:

  • Do not assume that state common law rules protecting the buyer will apply to federal labor law liabilities
  • Attempt to shift such liability to a solvent party as part of the transaction
  • Obtain a complete understanding of the exposure amount and discount the offer price accordingly
  • Consider negotiating with the debt holder and arriving at an agreement prior to purchasing the assets
  • Carefully analyze under the facts whether there are “good reasons” why successor liability should not apply
This blog is made available by Foley & Lardner LLP (“Foley” or “the Firm”) for informational purposes only. It is not meant to convey the Firm’s legal position on behalf of any client, nor is it intended to convey specific legal advice. Any opinions expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the views of Foley & Lardner LLP, its partners, or its clients. Accordingly, do not act upon this information without seeking counsel from a licensed attorney. This blog is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Communicating with Foley through this website by email, blog post, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship for any legal matter. Therefore, any communication or material you transmit to Foley through this blog, whether by email, blog post or any other manner, will not be treated as confidential or proprietary. The information on this blog is published “AS IS” and is not guaranteed to be complete, accurate, and or up-to-date. Foley makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, as to the operation or content of the site. Foley expressly disclaims all other guarantees, warranties, conditions and representations of any kind, either express or implied, whether arising under any statute, law, commercial use or otherwise, including implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Foley or any of its partners, officers, employees, agents or affiliates be liable, directly or indirectly, under any theory of law (contract, tort, negligence or otherwise), to you or anyone else, for any claims, losses or damages, direct, indirect special, incidental, punitive or consequential, resulting from or occasioned by the creation, use of or reliance on this site (including information and other content) or any third party websites or the information, resources or material accessed through any such websites. In some jurisdictions, the contents of this blog may be considered Attorney Advertising. If applicable, please note that prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Photographs are for dramatization purposes only and may include models. Likenesses do not necessarily imply current client, partnership or employee status.

Related Services

Insights

Cryptocurrency in China is like BIG BROTHER in 1984!
20 October 2019
Internet, IT & e-Discovery Blog
California Governor Signs New Telehealth Insurance Law
18 October 2019
Health Care Law Today
Continued Increase in E-Commerce and Online Ordering Changes Landscape of Urban Transportation
17 October 2019
Dashboard Insights
CMS Proposes Revisions to Stark Law
16 October 2019
Health Care Law Today
PATH Summit 2019
18-20 December 2019
Arlington, VA
MedTech Impact Expo & Conference
13-15 December 2019
Las Vegas, NV
Review of 2020 Medicare Changes for Telehealth
11 December 2019
Member Call
BRG Healthcare Leadership Conference
06 December 2019
Washington, D.C.