Potential Problems With Payroll Cards

23 September 2013 Labor & Employment Law Perspectives Blog

By Julie A. Angelini

For several years now, the use of payroll cards has been an emerging trend as a mechanism for paying employees their wages. A payroll card is a payment method that allows employers to pay wages to their employees via a reloadable prepaid card that essentially acts as a debit card.

However, the use of payroll cards has not come without its share of controversy, and that controversy surrounding the payroll card recently took center stage when a class action lawsuit was filed in Pennsylvania by a McDonald’s employee who was required to receive her wages on a payroll card. The employee complained of additional fees and costs she faced in order to withdraw cash and check her card balance.

In response to the lawsuit, the federal Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) issued a bulletin cautioning employers that they cannot require employees to receive their wages on payroll cards. In other words, employees must have the ability to elect an alternative form of payment other than the payroll card. The CFPB also provided a list of requirements for employers to follow should they offer these payroll cards as an option. In particular, employers must provide employees clear details about the fees associated with the payroll cards. In addition, employers should be aware of the possibility that the fees associated with the payroll cards can effectively reduce an hourly workers’ pay below minimum wage, which could lead to potential Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) violations for employers.

The CFPB bulletin also indicates that employers desiring to use payroll cards must provide all required disclosures to employees regarding potential fees and costs associated with the payroll card. Employers are also advised to obtain advanced written consent from their employees to be paid by a payroll card and review any potential FLSA implications that could be triggered by use of the payroll card.

While payroll cards offer some administrative advantages to employers, they are not without their risks as well. If your company is using or considering using a payroll card option as a method to provide employees with their wages, we strongly suggest having legal counsel review the proposed program to assess its risks.

This blog is made available by Foley & Lardner LLP (“Foley” or “the Firm”) for informational purposes only. It is not meant to convey the Firm’s legal position on behalf of any client, nor is it intended to convey specific legal advice. Any opinions expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the views of Foley & Lardner LLP, its partners, or its clients. Accordingly, do not act upon this information without seeking counsel from a licensed attorney. This blog is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Communicating with Foley through this website by email, blog post, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship for any legal matter. Therefore, any communication or material you transmit to Foley through this blog, whether by email, blog post or any other manner, will not be treated as confidential or proprietary. The information on this blog is published “AS IS” and is not guaranteed to be complete, accurate, and or up-to-date. Foley makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, as to the operation or content of the site. Foley expressly disclaims all other guarantees, warranties, conditions and representations of any kind, either express or implied, whether arising under any statute, law, commercial use or otherwise, including implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Foley or any of its partners, officers, employees, agents or affiliates be liable, directly or indirectly, under any theory of law (contract, tort, negligence or otherwise), to you or anyone else, for any claims, losses or damages, direct, indirect special, incidental, punitive or consequential, resulting from or occasioned by the creation, use of or reliance on this site (including information and other content) or any third party websites or the information, resources or material accessed through any such websites. In some jurisdictions, the contents of this blog may be considered Attorney Advertising. If applicable, please note that prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Photographs are for dramatization purposes only and may include models. Likenesses do not necessarily imply current client, partnership or employee status.

Related Services