The EEOC's Strategic Enforcement Plan: Targets for 2013-2016

28 October 2013 Labor & Employment Law Perspectives Blog

In 2012, the EEOC released its Strategic Plan for 2012-2016, detailing the areas where it would be focusing its attention during the next few years. As part of the Strategic Plan, the EEOC also drafted a Strategic Enforcement Plan, which establishes its enforcement priorities for fiscal years 2013-2016. These priorities will reportedly receive more of the EEOC’s limited funding and staff attention, and local EEOC offices will be entitled to use their discretion to bring cases which fall into these categories. EEOC staff will also receive targeted training on these particular areas.

As stated in the Commission’s Strategic Plan, the EEOC’s main enforcement priorities for the next three years will be:

  1. Eliminating barriers in recruiting and hiring: targeting class-based recruitment and hiring practices that discriminate against racial, ethnic, and religious groups, older workers, women and people with disabilities.
  2. Protecting immigrant, migrant, and other vulnerable workers: targeting disparate pay, job segregation, harassment, trafficking, and discriminatory policies affecting vulnerable workers who may by unable or unwilling to enforce their rights.
  3. Addressing emerging and developing issues: targeting emerging issues in equal employment law, including developing theories, judicial decisions, and administrative interpretations.
  4. Enforcing equal pay laws: targeting gender discrimination in compensation systems.
  5. Preserving access to the legal system: targeting policies and practices that discourage or prohibit individuals from exercising their rights or the EEOC from investigations and enforcement actions.
  6. Preventing harassment through systematic enforcement and targeted outreach: pursuit of systematic investigations and litigation to deter workplace harassment.

The EEOC has recently taken steps to follow through with the priorities outlined in its Strategic Enforcement Plan. In August 2013, it brought a suit against fast food franchise accusing it of gender-based discrimination in both pay and conditions of employment (see point number 4 above). The EEOC alleged that female employees were hired at significantly lower pay rates, even though they performed the same duties. They also alleged that male employees were given more hours than female employees, and that when the restaurant was not busy, female employees were sent home and male employees were not. This case is currently pending.

Within the context of addressing emerging issues (point number 3 above), the EEOC has placed special emphasis on addressing pregnancy-related limitations under the Americans with Disabilities Act Amendments Act (ADAAA) and the Pregnancy Discrimination Act (PDA). The EEOC has recently been asked by the Supreme Court  to weigh in on the types of accommodations that pregnant employees should receive under federal law. Many legal observers believe the EEOC will push for more expansive accommodations in furtherance of its strategic enforcement goal in this area, though it has not yet publicly stated its position. It is also likely the EEOC will take similar actions where appropriate with respect to its other strategic enforcement priorities. While all employment-law related issues merit concern and attention within an organization, employers should be particularly mindful of where the EEOC is expected to focus its attention over the next few years.

This blog is made available by Foley & Lardner LLP (“Foley” or “the Firm”) for informational purposes only. It is not meant to convey the Firm’s legal position on behalf of any client, nor is it intended to convey specific legal advice. Any opinions expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the views of Foley & Lardner LLP, its partners, or its clients. Accordingly, do not act upon this information without seeking counsel from a licensed attorney. This blog is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Communicating with Foley through this website by email, blog post, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship for any legal matter. Therefore, any communication or material you transmit to Foley through this blog, whether by email, blog post or any other manner, will not be treated as confidential or proprietary. The information on this blog is published “AS IS” and is not guaranteed to be complete, accurate, and or up-to-date. Foley makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, as to the operation or content of the site. Foley expressly disclaims all other guarantees, warranties, conditions and representations of any kind, either express or implied, whether arising under any statute, law, commercial use or otherwise, including implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Foley or any of its partners, officers, employees, agents or affiliates be liable, directly or indirectly, under any theory of law (contract, tort, negligence or otherwise), to you or anyone else, for any claims, losses or damages, direct, indirect special, incidental, punitive or consequential, resulting from or occasioned by the creation, use of or reliance on this site (including information and other content) or any third party websites or the information, resources or material accessed through any such websites. In some jurisdictions, the contents of this blog may be considered Attorney Advertising. If applicable, please note that prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Photographs are for dramatization purposes only and may include models. Likenesses do not necessarily imply current client, partnership or employee status.

Related Services