Staying Ahead of the Curve: Don't Get Drunk on BYOD

25 November 2013 Labor & Employment Law Perspectives Blog

The rise of the smartphone has ushered in a new era of information exchange and communication, and employers are wise to stay ahead of the curve and leverage this technology to their advantage. Permitting the use of smartphones and tablets in the workplace can increase employee productivity, help ensure accountability, and improve employee morale, among many other benefits. Recognizing the economic value of a happier and more productive workforce, some employers have even gone so far as to buy or reimburse employees for their own personal smartphones or tablets that are used for both work-related and personal activities. In the information age, these BYOD (“Bring Your Own Device”) policies are popping up everywhere and are a huge boon to the American workforce.

Yet some sobriety, caution and forethought should be given when developing a BYOD policy for your company. Privacy concerns, protection of trade secrets and intellectual property, and cyber-harassment are only a few of the many potential issues a BYOD policy elicits. Creating a policy that fits your specific business and industry – and updating that policy as circumstances change – can help avoid the pitfalls BYOD can create.

Of major concern to most employees utilizing BYOD is their personal privacy. In a recent case, an Ohio federal court held that an employer could be criminally liable under the Stored Communications Act (“SCA”) for viewing an employee’s personal emails on a device she used for both work and personal activities without the employee’s consent. The employer told the employee she could use the company-issued device for personal email, but was given no indication that the employer would look at any such emails. Without a clear policy specifically stating the terms of privacy expectations on such devices – whether personal or company-issued – the court held that employers may be liable for monitoring or accessing personal communications. The court went so far as to indicate that employees must give specific, clear authorization to the employer before it can monitor its employees’ communications.

For employers, a greater concern may relate to trade secrets, intellectual property, and other confidential information. Employees who use BYOD will inevitably have access to some non-public information – possibly residing in their email, or on some type of remote access technology. Depending on the nature of the business or the industry, a BYOD policy should contemplate how to protect this information from inadvertent disclosure. This may include device monitoring via a global tracking system, the ability to remotely wipe the device, or the installation of spyware protection software.

For all the advantages BYOD provides, a sober approach to crafting an effective policy is imperative. However, the legal landscape has yet to catch up with the rapid pace at which employers are embracing new technological advances, which makes creating an effective policy all the more difficult. If your company permits or is contemplating BYOD in the workplace, being ahead of the curve with the applicable policies can help avoid a hangover in the future.

This blog is made available by Foley & Lardner LLP (“Foley” or “the Firm”) for informational purposes only. It is not meant to convey the Firm’s legal position on behalf of any client, nor is it intended to convey specific legal advice. Any opinions expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the views of Foley & Lardner LLP, its partners, or its clients. Accordingly, do not act upon this information without seeking counsel from a licensed attorney. This blog is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Communicating with Foley through this website by email, blog post, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship for any legal matter. Therefore, any communication or material you transmit to Foley through this blog, whether by email, blog post or any other manner, will not be treated as confidential or proprietary. The information on this blog is published “AS IS” and is not guaranteed to be complete, accurate, and or up-to-date. Foley makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, as to the operation or content of the site. Foley expressly disclaims all other guarantees, warranties, conditions and representations of any kind, either express or implied, whether arising under any statute, law, commercial use or otherwise, including implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Foley or any of its partners, officers, employees, agents or affiliates be liable, directly or indirectly, under any theory of law (contract, tort, negligence or otherwise), to you or anyone else, for any claims, losses or damages, direct, indirect special, incidental, punitive or consequential, resulting from or occasioned by the creation, use of or reliance on this site (including information and other content) or any third party websites or the information, resources or material accessed through any such websites. In some jurisdictions, the contents of this blog may be considered Attorney Advertising. If applicable, please note that prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Photographs are for dramatization purposes only and may include models. Likenesses do not necessarily imply current client, partnership or employee status.

Related Services