Thanks for Being a Delaware Corporation: Here Is Your $180,000 Franchise Tax Bill

18 February 2014 Privacy, Cybersecurity & Technology Law Perspectives Blog

Delaware is the state of incorporation for a majority of venture-backed and publicly-traded corporations. The Delaware courts have developed considerable expertise in dealing with corporate issues and there is a substantial body of case law construing Delaware law. As a result, investors are familiar and comfortable with Delaware. Delaware law and courts are also deferential to directors and management, looking skeptically on frivolous stockholder litigation and providing protections against hostile bids.

For all of its benefits, Delaware has convoluted methods of calculating the franchise tax payable by corporations for the privilege of being incorporated in the state, which can result unnecessarily high bills without some advance thought and planning. Of course, large corporations with substantial assets will have significant franchise tax obligations (up to $180,000), but there is no reason for smaller corporations to be getting stuck with large bills.

Under one method, a corporation can pay franchise tax based on its authorized number of shares. This option provides for low franchise tax for corporations with few authorized shares, but is impracticable for corporations with a large stockholder base or multi-class capital structure. The amount of franchise tax due as shown on the bill sent out by the State of Delaware is calculated under this method, but is subject to recalculation under the alternative “assumed par value” method prior to payment.

Under the “assumed par value” method, a corporation calculates franchise tax based on a combination of its gross assets, authorized shares, issued shares, and par value, with the ratio of issued shares to authorized shares being especially important. For example, a corporation with $10,000,000 in assets and 5,000,000 issued shares of common stock, with a par value of $0.01 per share, would have a franchise tax bill of $7,000 if it had 10,000,000 authorized shares of common stock, but only a $4,200 bill if it had 6,000,000 authorized shares of common stock. It is possible that the additional 4,000,000 authorized shares serve no practical purpose for this corporation, other than to increase the franchise tax bill.

Corporations with less than $1,000,000 in assets and a single class of stock should be paying $700 or less in annual franchise tax under most circumstances, and it is important for all corporations to ensure that there aren’t too many authorized, but unissued shares at any time. This is a crucial consideration in connection with setting up a corporation and should be revisited whenever there are changes in a corporation’s capital structure.

This blog is made available by Foley & Lardner LLP (“Foley” or “the Firm”) for informational purposes only. It is not meant to convey the Firm’s legal position on behalf of any client, nor is it intended to convey specific legal advice. Any opinions expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the views of Foley & Lardner LLP, its partners, or its clients. Accordingly, do not act upon this information without seeking counsel from a licensed attorney. This blog is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Communicating with Foley through this website by email, blog post, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship for any legal matter. Therefore, any communication or material you transmit to Foley through this blog, whether by email, blog post or any other manner, will not be treated as confidential or proprietary. The information on this blog is published “AS IS” and is not guaranteed to be complete, accurate, and or up-to-date. Foley makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, as to the operation or content of the site. Foley expressly disclaims all other guarantees, warranties, conditions and representations of any kind, either express or implied, whether arising under any statute, law, commercial use or otherwise, including implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Foley or any of its partners, officers, employees, agents or affiliates be liable, directly or indirectly, under any theory of law (contract, tort, negligence or otherwise), to you or anyone else, for any claims, losses or damages, direct, indirect special, incidental, punitive or consequential, resulting from or occasioned by the creation, use of or reliance on this site (including information and other content) or any third party websites or the information, resources or material accessed through any such websites. In some jurisdictions, the contents of this blog may be considered Attorney Advertising. If applicable, please note that prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Photographs are for dramatization purposes only and may include models. Likenesses do not necessarily imply current client, partnership or employee status.

Related Services