New York Reconsidering Private Equity Investment in Health Care Entities

31 March 2014 Health Care Law Today Blog

New York State is again considering whether to allow private equity investment in health care facilities after the first proposal to do so was dropped from the 2013-2014 enacted budget due to a lack of support. Gov. Andrew Cuomo’s 2014-2015 budget proposal calls for a two-year pilot program, subject to the Public Health and Health Planning Council’s approval, to establish up to five eligible for-profit corporations as owners or operators of hospitals. To be eligible, the corporations must affiliate with at least one academic medical center or teaching hospital and cannot be publicly traded corporations or private corporations with more than thirty-five stockholders. The purpose behind the pilot program is to “assist in restructuring health care delivery systems by allowing for increased capital investment in health care facilities.”

Pilot Program's Implementation Would Mark a Drastic Change

The implementation of the pilot program allowing private investment in hospitals would mark a drastic change for the health care industry in New York due to the State’s historically strict regulation of the practice of medicine, and of the establishment of hospitals. Current New York law prohibits a business corporation from practicing medicine or employing a physician to provide professional medical services, with some exceptions, unless the entity is “established” as a licensed hospital entity. Historically, other than a few physician-owned hospitals, hospitals in New York have been primarily operated by non-profit entities. This approach has prevented private investment in hospitals in New York.

Proponents of the pilot program argue that hospitals are in desperate need of capital and the reorganization of the health care system is necessary in order to save the facilities that are in danger of closing or going bankrupt. On the other hand, those against private investment in hospitals argue that becoming for-profit would allow owners and investors to cherry-pick certain patients and procedures, forcing the poorest and sickest patients into the already overburdened safety net hospitals. Moreover, prohibitions against the corporate practice of medicine are rooted in the concern that private companies could influence and interfere with medical decision-making. 

The 2014-2015 budget is expected to be resolved in early April so a decision on private investment in health care facilities is certainly on the horizon. While the pilot program has the potential to provide an opportunity for struggling health care facilities, its adoption faces many hurdles, which proved to be the case in 2013.

This blog is made available by Foley & Lardner LLP (“Foley” or “the Firm”) for informational purposes only. It is not meant to convey the Firm’s legal position on behalf of any client, nor is it intended to convey specific legal advice. Any opinions expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the views of Foley & Lardner LLP, its partners, or its clients. Accordingly, do not act upon this information without seeking counsel from a licensed attorney. This blog is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Communicating with Foley through this website by email, blog post, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship for any legal matter. Therefore, any communication or material you transmit to Foley through this blog, whether by email, blog post or any other manner, will not be treated as confidential or proprietary. The information on this blog is published “AS IS” and is not guaranteed to be complete, accurate, and or up-to-date. Foley makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, as to the operation or content of the site. Foley expressly disclaims all other guarantees, warranties, conditions and representations of any kind, either express or implied, whether arising under any statute, law, commercial use or otherwise, including implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Foley or any of its partners, officers, employees, agents or affiliates be liable, directly or indirectly, under any theory of law (contract, tort, negligence or otherwise), to you or anyone else, for any claims, losses or damages, direct, indirect special, incidental, punitive or consequential, resulting from or occasioned by the creation, use of or reliance on this site (including information and other content) or any third party websites or the information, resources or material accessed through any such websites. In some jurisdictions, the contents of this blog may be considered Attorney Advertising. If applicable, please note that prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Photographs are for dramatization purposes only and may include models. Likenesses do not necessarily imply current client, partnership or employee status.

Insights

A Review of Recent Whistleblower Developments
19 July 2019
Legal News: Whistleblower Developments
Cloud security inadequate for Cyber threats, are you surprised?
19 July 2019
Internet, IT & e-Discovery Blog
Blockchain: A Tool With a Future in Healthcare
18 July 2019
Health Care Law Today
Do You Know What IMMEX Stands For?
16 July 2019
Dashboard Insights
Review of 2020 Medicare Changes for Telehealth
11 December 2019
Member Call
2019 NDI Executive Exchange
14-15 November 2019
Chicago, IL
MAGI’s Clinical Research Conference
29 October 2019
Las Vegas, NV
Association for Corporate Counsel Annual Meeting 2019
27-30 October 2019
Phoenix, AZ