Five Intellectual Property Considerations for Startups - Part II

09 December 2014 Privacy, Cybersecurity & Technology Law Perspectives Blog

In Part I of this article, we introduced two of five threshold Intellectual Property (IP) questions that every startup should consider:

  • Do you own all of your IP?
  • How can you safely discuss your IP with others?

In this article, we introduce the remaining three considerations:

  • How do you identify and protect your competitive differentiators?
  • Do you have an idea or solution that is eligible for patent protection?
  • What is your IP strategy?

 

3. How do you identify and protect your competitive differentiators?

Time and time again, many startups tout their solution as better, faster or more user friendly than their competitors’, not realizing that the competitors also make the same claims. By doing so, they sound like every other startup with what seems like a good idea, but without a tangible or functional explanation of what really makes the company or solution different. Investors, partners, advisors and potential customers have heard these high level claims of a startup’s potential competitive differentiators before, and are not easily impressed. Before a startup can provide IP protection for competitive differentiators, the startup must be able to specifically identify the functional features of their solution that differentiate them from the competition, and provide or enable such features. Once doing so, the startup then needs to consider which tools in the toolbox of IP protection (trade secret, copyright, trademark, patent, contractual) to deploy to protect its competitive differentiators.

4. Do you have an idea or solution that is eligible for patent protection?

Far too often, startups highlight their competitive differentiators and claim they are first movers or the only ones to possess an effective solution, but then claim that it is not eligible for IP protection. Those statements usually contradict each other, because unless a startup is a “me-too” company that is more of a pure execution play, the company most likely has something worthy to protect via patent protection. Many startups struggle with understanding and finding what is patent protectable. Their solution may appear to be an integration of existing building blocks known in their industry. However, many startups create an innovative functionality that did not exist before. The company should consider whether or not such functionality is patent protectable.

5. What is your IP Strategy?

Every startup should have an IP strategy that is aligned with its business goals and objectives. An IP strategy is much more than filing a patent or trademark application. An IP strategy maps out how a startup will pursue and protect its intellectual property in a manner that fits into the short and longer-term plans of the company. An IP strategy should support a company’s growth and exit strategy. An ideal IP strategy is one that creates value, reduces risk, and is realistically achievable.

The next articles in this Series will delve deeper into each of these five primary considerations.  We will also suggest best practices. Check back soon!

This blog is made available by Foley & Lardner LLP (“Foley” or “the Firm”) for informational purposes only. It is not meant to convey the Firm’s legal position on behalf of any client, nor is it intended to convey specific legal advice. Any opinions expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the views of Foley & Lardner LLP, its partners, or its clients. Accordingly, do not act upon this information without seeking counsel from a licensed attorney. This blog is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Communicating with Foley through this website by email, blog post, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship for any legal matter. Therefore, any communication or material you transmit to Foley through this blog, whether by email, blog post or any other manner, will not be treated as confidential or proprietary. The information on this blog is published “AS IS” and is not guaranteed to be complete, accurate, and or up-to-date. Foley makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, as to the operation or content of the site. Foley expressly disclaims all other guarantees, warranties, conditions and representations of any kind, either express or implied, whether arising under any statute, law, commercial use or otherwise, including implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Foley or any of its partners, officers, employees, agents or affiliates be liable, directly or indirectly, under any theory of law (contract, tort, negligence or otherwise), to you or anyone else, for any claims, losses or damages, direct, indirect special, incidental, punitive or consequential, resulting from or occasioned by the creation, use of or reliance on this site (including information and other content) or any third party websites or the information, resources or material accessed through any such websites. In some jurisdictions, the contents of this blog may be considered Attorney Advertising. If applicable, please note that prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Photographs are for dramatization purposes only and may include models. Likenesses do not necessarily imply current client, partnership or employee status.

Related Services

Insights

Voting in the Age of COVID-19
26 October 2020
Coronavirus Resource Center:Back to Business
401(k) Fee Lawsuits: What Can a Plan Sponsor Do?
26 October 2020
Labor & Employment Law Perspectives
Department of Defense Formally Implements Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification Requirements for Department of Defense Contractors
26 October 2020
Legal News: Government Procurement
FinCEN Takes Action Against Bitcoin Mixer for Violating the Bank Secrecy Act
26 October 2020
Legal News: Government Enforcement Defense & Investigations