Feds Fast-Forward "Fissured" Focus

09 March 2015 Labor & Employment Law Perspectives Blog

As David Weil, the still relatively new United States Department of Labor (DOL) Wage and Hour Administrator describes it, an industry is “fissured” when large companies no longer directly employ the workers that produce their products or services. Fissuring occurs through subcontracting, franchising, and an extended supply chain, and is especially prevalent in the restaurant, hospitality, and construction industries. As the theory goes, this undermines responsibility for, and compliance with, labor laws, in part because government agencies do not have the resources to police small companies. The solution: Focus enforcement actions on companies at the top of the pyramid, even when current joint employment laws do not support liability.

The federal agencies have made no secret of their intention to effectuate this strategy, first advocated by Weil when he was a professor and union advocate. One example is the National Labor Relations Board’s (NLRB) recent decision to add six more unfair labor practice complaints, asserting joint employer status against one of the country’s major franchisors with its franchisees under the National Labor Relations Act and, therefore, it is responsible for its alleged violations. Another is the DOL’s recent request for a $49 million budget increase, justified in large part to support its fissured industry enforcement initiative. Administrator Weil’s blog entitled, “The Fissured Workplace” also provides fair warning to employers that subcontract, franchise, or use an extended supply chain. Not to be outdone, the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) has focused on vulnerable workers in fissured industries. Finally, unions applaud the expansion of the joint employer concept, as corporate campaigns often target the top of the employer pyramid.

What should employers do in response? First, if you are in a “fissured” industry, understand that you are a potential target. Second, realize that if an agency requests information about your contractors, subcontractors, suppliers, or franchisees, the ultimate goal may be to hold you responsible for their employment law compliance. Additionally, whatever information you provide may end up in the hands of a union. Therefore, carefully evaluate your obligation to disclose and the scope of such an obligation. Third, in responding to any audit or investigation that includes inquiries about contractors and subcontractors and their employers, clearly state from the outset that you are not a joint employer. Finally, demand that your contractors and subcontractors comply with labor and employment law without exercising control over their human resources activities.

This blog is made available by Foley & Lardner LLP (“Foley” or “the Firm”) for informational purposes only. It is not meant to convey the Firm’s legal position on behalf of any client, nor is it intended to convey specific legal advice. Any opinions expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the views of Foley & Lardner LLP, its partners, or its clients. Accordingly, do not act upon this information without seeking counsel from a licensed attorney. This blog is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Communicating with Foley through this website by email, blog post, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship for any legal matter. Therefore, any communication or material you transmit to Foley through this blog, whether by email, blog post or any other manner, will not be treated as confidential or proprietary. The information on this blog is published “AS IS” and is not guaranteed to be complete, accurate, and or up-to-date. Foley makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, as to the operation or content of the site. Foley expressly disclaims all other guarantees, warranties, conditions and representations of any kind, either express or implied, whether arising under any statute, law, commercial use or otherwise, including implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Foley or any of its partners, officers, employees, agents or affiliates be liable, directly or indirectly, under any theory of law (contract, tort, negligence or otherwise), to you or anyone else, for any claims, losses or damages, direct, indirect special, incidental, punitive or consequential, resulting from or occasioned by the creation, use of or reliance on this site (including information and other content) or any third party websites or the information, resources or material accessed through any such websites. In some jurisdictions, the contents of this blog may be considered Attorney Advertising. If applicable, please note that prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Photographs are for dramatization purposes only and may include models. Likenesses do not necessarily imply current client, partnership or employee status.

Related Services

Insights

Will Other Tech Companies Join Microsoft in Honoring CCPA Across the U.S.?
18 November 2019
Internet, IT & e-Discovery Blog
Get Off My Lawn! Employers Gain Expanded Rights to Keep Unions Away from Their Property
18 November 2019
Labor & Employment Law Perspectives
Debunking Conventional Labor and Employment Wisdom
18 November 2019
Labor & Employment Law Perspectives
Oncology Care First: What You Need to Know About the Proposed Oncology Care First Model
18 November 2019
Health Care Law Today
PATH Summit 2019
18-20 December 2019
Arlington, VA
Madison CLE Days
18-19 December 2019
Madison, WI
MedTech Impact Expo & Conference
13-15 December 2019
Las Vegas, NV
Review of 2020 Medicare Changes for Telehealth
11 December 2019
Member Call