Repositioning of Nursing Homes to Alternative Models of Care

31 March 2015 Health Care Law Today Blog

The juncture of the increasing drive to lower health care costs, consumer preferences for at home care or care in more residential environments, and the ability to deliver care as needed in portable and flexible ways, all have combined to produce an acceleration in the closure and repositioning of traditional SNFs to alternative uses. All of this is creating occasional access issues for residents even in States where there is a surplus of beds or a moratorium in place on new construction.

Why are we seeing an acceleration of closures and sales? First, operators and capital seek to  build new facilities with shorter term stay and higher acuity capability to be responsive to ACOs and discharge sources seeking capable network partners who will reduce readmission risk. Second, in certain markets opportunities exist to reposition a facility to assisted, independent or combined use — this is especially true in over-bedded markets that are in particularly good demographic locations. Third, and as a  by-product of the above, operators can monetize the value of certificate of need beds in markets that are bed constrained.

However, headwinds are building on the regulatory side. Recently, the Boston Globe reported in its headline (3/23/15) story “As Nursing Homes Close, Residents Scramble To Find Alternatives,” that unlike hospitals, SNFs are not required to go through a public notice and hearing process to close—merely filing a closure plan with The Department of Public Health (DPH) and advance notice to DPH suffices. Recently, Massachusetts has enacted legislation which would require such a hearing, but regulations are yet to be implemented enforcing this law. After many years of over-bedded States, moratoria and low Medicaid rates, it would indeed be ironic if a shrinkage of available beds makes new construction more attractive to investors. Whatever the future, it is reasonably likely that regulators will more carefully watch closure and repositioning projects to ensure access to SNF beds, possibly implementing conditions to closure or relocation that will impact operators’ strategies in an evolving and uncertain reimbursement market.

This blog is made available by Foley & Lardner LLP (“Foley” or “the Firm”) for informational purposes only. It is not meant to convey the Firm’s legal position on behalf of any client, nor is it intended to convey specific legal advice. Any opinions expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the views of Foley & Lardner LLP, its partners, or its clients. Accordingly, do not act upon this information without seeking counsel from a licensed attorney. This blog is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Communicating with Foley through this website by email, blog post, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship for any legal matter. Therefore, any communication or material you transmit to Foley through this blog, whether by email, blog post or any other manner, will not be treated as confidential or proprietary. The information on this blog is published “AS IS” and is not guaranteed to be complete, accurate, and or up-to-date. Foley makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, as to the operation or content of the site. Foley expressly disclaims all other guarantees, warranties, conditions and representations of any kind, either express or implied, whether arising under any statute, law, commercial use or otherwise, including implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Foley or any of its partners, officers, employees, agents or affiliates be liable, directly or indirectly, under any theory of law (contract, tort, negligence or otherwise), to you or anyone else, for any claims, losses or damages, direct, indirect special, incidental, punitive or consequential, resulting from or occasioned by the creation, use of or reliance on this site (including information and other content) or any third party websites or the information, resources or material accessed through any such websites. In some jurisdictions, the contents of this blog may be considered Attorney Advertising. If applicable, please note that prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Photographs are for dramatization purposes only and may include models. Likenesses do not necessarily imply current client, partnership or employee status.