Does the "Doc Fix" Bill Help Telemedicine and Telehealth?

20 April 2015 Health Care Law Today Blog

In a word: yes. Telemedicine was one of the many beneficiaries of changes introduced by the so-called “doc fix” bill, formally titled the Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act (H.R. 2). The legislation was passed by Congress on April 15, 2015 and signed into law by the President on April 16, 2015. It introduces sweeping changes to the reimbursement methodologies and financing of health care in the United States, including a notable shift away from the traditional fee-for-service model and towards accountable care organizations (ACOs), risk-based payment, and a focus on quality and population health.

As organizations embracing telemedicine recognize, these new payment models are ideally suited to the improved access, quality and care management offered by telemedicine technologies. The Act is a signal to the provider community that embracing innovative care delivery, such as telemedicine and telehealth, is an important step to positioning your organization to best capture these new payment opportunities.

But the Act also includes specific provisions benefiting telehealth and remote patient monitoring (RPM), particularly for the Medicare program.  It states:

  • Telehealth and remote patient monitoring are expressly recognized as, and included in the definition of, “Clinical Practice Improvement Activities” along with care coordination, population health management, and monitoring of health conditions.
  • New “Alternative Payment Models” may include payment for telehealth services, even if the service is not otherwise covered by the traditional Medicare program (42 U.S.C. 1395(m)).
  • The GAO is required to conduct a study on telehealth and the Medicare program, publishing the report no later than April 2017. Specifically, it states:

STUDY ON TELEHEALTH SERVICES.  The Comptroller General of the United States shall conduct a study on the following:

How the definition of telehealth across various Federal programs and Federal efforts can inform the use of telehealth in the Medicare program under title XVIII of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395 et seq.).

Issues that can facilitate or inhibit the use of telehealth under the Medicare program under such title, including oversight and professional licensure, changing technology, privacy and security, infrastructure requirements, and varying needs across urban and rural areas.

Potential implications of greater use of telehealth with respect to payment and delivery system transformations under the Medicare program under such title XVIII and the Medicaid program under title XIX of such Act (42 U.S.C. 1396 et seq.).

How the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services monitors payments made under the Medicare program under such title XVIII to providers for telehealth services.

  • The GAO is required to conduct a second study on remote patient monitoring and the Medicare program, publishing the report no later than April 2017. Specifically, it states:

 STUDY ON REMOTE PATIENT MONITORING SERVICES.  The Comptroller General of the United States shall conduct a study:

of the dissemination of remote patient monitoring technology in the private health insurance market;

of the financial incentives in the private health insurance market relating to adoption of such technology;

of the barriers to adoption of such services under the Medicare program under title XVIII of the Social Security Act;

that evaluates the patients, conditions, and

clinical circumstances that could most benefit from remote patient monitoring services; and

that evaluates the challenges related to establishing appropriate valuation for remote patient monitoring services under the Medicare physician fee schedule under section 1848 of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395w–4) in order to accurately reflect the resources involved in furnishing such services.

REMOTE PATIENT MONITORING SERVICES.— The term ‘‘remote patient monitoring services’’ means services furnished through remote patient monitoring technology.

REMOTE PATIENT MONITORING TECHNOLOGY.— The term ‘‘remote patient monitoring technology’’ means a coordinated system that uses one or more home-based or mobile monitoring devices that automatically transmit vital sign data or information on activities of daily living and may include responses to assessment questions collected on the devices wirelessly or through a telecommunications connection to a server that complies with the Federal regulations (concerning the privacy of individually identifiable health information) promulgated under section 264(c) of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996, as part of an established plan of care for that patient that includes the review and interpretation of that data by a health care professional.

The Act contains many provisions intended to promote innovation and care delivery by catalyzing health care organizations to invest in and use the powerful telemedicine tools and technologies available in the marketplace. This vision is consistent with prior surveys of health care executive leadership. By continuing to develop their telemedicine programs and pursuing new payment options, leaders are showing they know that their smartest play is to be ready for the law to catch up — because it will.

Are you interested in learning more about telemedicine business models and new payment opportunities? Foley offers opportunities to get up to speed with the latest developments:

Upcoming Presentations

On April 19-22, 2015, Foley Partner Nathaniel Lacktman will be a speaker at the Health Care Compliance Association’s (HCCA) 2015 Compliance Institute in Orlando, presenting on “Telehealth: Legal and Compliance Issues.”

On May 3-5, 2015, Foley Partner Nathaniel Lacktman will be a speaker at the American Telemedicine Association’s (ATA) Annual International Meeting and Expo in Los Angeles, presenting on “Legal Issues in Telemedicine Business Models.”

On July 20-22, 2015, Foley Partner Nathaniel Lacktman will be a speaker at the mHealth + Telehealth World Congress 2015 in Boston, presenting on “Reimbursement and Financing of Connected Health Programs.”

Online Resources

For more information on telemedicine, including publications, presentations and other materials, visit www.foley.com/telemedicine.

This blog is made available by Foley & Lardner LLP (“Foley” or “the Firm”) for informational purposes only. It is not meant to convey the Firm’s legal position on behalf of any client, nor is it intended to convey specific legal advice. Any opinions expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the views of Foley & Lardner LLP, its partners, or its clients. Accordingly, do not act upon this information without seeking counsel from a licensed attorney. This blog is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Communicating with Foley through this website by email, blog post, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship for any legal matter. Therefore, any communication or material you transmit to Foley through this blog, whether by email, blog post or any other manner, will not be treated as confidential or proprietary. The information on this blog is published “AS IS” and is not guaranteed to be complete, accurate, and or up-to-date. Foley makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, as to the operation or content of the site. Foley expressly disclaims all other guarantees, warranties, conditions and representations of any kind, either express or implied, whether arising under any statute, law, commercial use or otherwise, including implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Foley or any of its partners, officers, employees, agents or affiliates be liable, directly or indirectly, under any theory of law (contract, tort, negligence or otherwise), to you or anyone else, for any claims, losses or damages, direct, indirect special, incidental, punitive or consequential, resulting from or occasioned by the creation, use of or reliance on this site (including information and other content) or any third party websites or the information, resources or material accessed through any such websites. In some jurisdictions, the contents of this blog may be considered Attorney Advertising. If applicable, please note that prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Photographs are for dramatization purposes only and may include models. Likenesses do not necessarily imply current client, partnership or employee status.

Related Services

Insights

California Establishes Fund to Combat Wildfire Threats
15 July 2019
Renewable Energy Outlook
There’s No Place Like Home – But Is That a Reasonable Accommodation?
15 July 2019
Labor & Employment Law Perspectives
Beginning Construction Continuity Safe Harbor Extended for National Security Concerns
15 July 2019
Renewable Energy Outlook
Manufacturing MarketTrends | July 2019, Issue 2
12 July 2019
Manufacturing MarketTrends
Review of 2020 Medicare Changes for Telehealth
11 December 2019
Member Call
2019 NDI Executive Exchange
14-15 November 2019
Chicago, IL
MAGI’s Clinical Research Conference
29 October 2019
Las Vegas, NV
Association for Corporate Counsel Annual Meeting 2019
27-30 October 2019
Phoenix, AZ