Health Plans in Connecticut Must Cover Telehealth Services

06 July 2015 Health Care Law Today Blog

Connecticut marks the 28th state to enact a telemedicine commercial reimbursement statute. The legislation (SB-467) was sponsored by Senators Looney, Duff, Crisco and Gerratana with twenty co-sponsor senators, and was signed into law by Connecticut Governor Dannel Malloy on June 22, 2015, representing the culmination of a hard-fought effort to facilitate patient access to telemedicine services through private sector growth and development.

The law requires commercial insurers to cover services provided via telemedicine and telehealth to the same extent those services are covered though in-person visits. The law also protects patients against cost-shifting by requiring that telehealth coverage must be subject to the same terms and conditions applicable to all other benefits under the patient’s insurance policy (e.g., deductibles, co-insurance or other conditions for coverage).

The telehealth commercial insurance provisions take effect January 1, 2016 and apply to all policies delivered, issued, renewed, amended or continued after that date.

The Connecticut law contains a broad definition of telehealth, stating:

“Telehealth means the mode of delivering health care or other health services via information and communication technologies to facilitate the diagnosis, consultation and treatment, education, care management and self-management of a patient’s physical and mental health, and includes (A) interaction between the patient at the originating site and the telehealth provider at a distant site, and (B) synchronous interactions, asynchronous store and forward transfers or remote patient monitoring. Telehealth does not include the use of facsimile, audio-only telephone, texting or electronic mail.”

Following a potential trend starting to be seen in among telehealth statutes recently enacted in other states, the Connecticut law excludes from the definition of covered telehealth the use of facsimile, audio-only telephone, texting or electronic mail.

However, Connecticut’s broad definition of telehealth is important to note because it does not limit covered telehealth services exclusively to services performed by a “telehealth provider at a distant site”, but also includes “synchronous interactions, asynchronous store and forward transfers or remote patient monitoring.” The latter language does not restrict these remote services exclusively to “telehealth provider.” Moreover, the Connecticut law squarely addresses the issue of commercial coverage for these telehealth services, including remote patient monitoring. The law does not allow a health plan to exclude a service from coverage “solely because such service is provided only through telehealth and not through in-person consultation between the insured and a health care provider” provided telehealth is appropriate for the provision of such service. This requirement will help ensure Connecticut health plan members enjoy benefits of telehealth services such as remote patient monitoring and connected care technologies.

In contrast to the Connecticut law, the language in some other state statutes is less clear whether insurers are required to cover new telehealth services if those services are not currently covered under the health plan policy as in-person services. This is because some services, such as remote monitoring, do not naturally lend themselves to in-person encounters and are designed to be utilized via telehealth.

Nationwide, state legislatures are enacting laws stating that commercial health insurance companies must cover medical services provided via telemedicine to the same extent they cover medical services provided in-person. With Connecticut on board, 28 states plus the District of Columbia have enacted these telemedicine commercial insurance laws, with legislation currently under discussion or development in many more states. These laws are intended to promote innovation and care delivery in the private sector by catalyzing health care providers and plans to invest in and use the powerful telemedicine tools and technologies available in the marketplace.

Some Connecticut hospitals and health care providers have already taken the initiative and successfully embedded telehealth into their patient care delivery models. Surveys also show healthcare executives are bullish on the opportunities offered by telehealth. Results indicate significant increases in quality of care, patient satisfaction, and institutional cost-savings. With this step forward to drive the Connecticut commercial insurance market, these telehealth benefits will be enjoyed by patients across “the Constitution State.”

This blog is made available by Foley & Lardner LLP (“Foley” or “the Firm”) for informational purposes only. It is not meant to convey the Firm’s legal position on behalf of any client, nor is it intended to convey specific legal advice. Any opinions expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the views of Foley & Lardner LLP, its partners, or its clients. Accordingly, do not act upon this information without seeking counsel from a licensed attorney. This blog is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Communicating with Foley through this website by email, blog post, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship for any legal matter. Therefore, any communication or material you transmit to Foley through this blog, whether by email, blog post or any other manner, will not be treated as confidential or proprietary. The information on this blog is published “AS IS” and is not guaranteed to be complete, accurate, and or up-to-date. Foley makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, as to the operation or content of the site. Foley expressly disclaims all other guarantees, warranties, conditions and representations of any kind, either express or implied, whether arising under any statute, law, commercial use or otherwise, including implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Foley or any of its partners, officers, employees, agents or affiliates be liable, directly or indirectly, under any theory of law (contract, tort, negligence or otherwise), to you or anyone else, for any claims, losses or damages, direct, indirect special, incidental, punitive or consequential, resulting from or occasioned by the creation, use of or reliance on this site (including information and other content) or any third party websites or the information, resources or material accessed through any such websites. In some jurisdictions, the contents of this blog may be considered Attorney Advertising. If applicable, please note that prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Photographs are for dramatization purposes only and may include models. Likenesses do not necessarily imply current client, partnership or employee status.