Tell Me How Much My Coworkers Make… Or I’ll Sue You

19 January 2016 Labor & Employment Law Perspectives Blog

The Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs (OFCCP) – an agency of the Department of Labor – has enacted a rule requiring federal contractors and subcontractors to disclose information regarding pay practices and compensation to any inquiring employee or applicant. The rule does not require employers to directly inform individuals about pay practices or data, but it does permit the inquiring individual to question or consult with other employees, and the employer may not discriminate or take any adverse action against the him or her for doing so.

While the rule may have been created with good intentions, the reality is that federal contractors will be put further under the microscope with regards to their pay practices. Employees or applicants who find out they are receiving less compensation than others who they subjectively believe their peers to be may neglect to consider the other factors considered by the employer in making compensation decisions, such as experience, education level, teamwork, and so forth. In addition, the rule may also be a tool that labor organizations can use to their advantage by attempting to require employers to reveal compensation information, which can then be used against an employer for campaign purposes to sow discord among employee populations.

The new rule expands on similar protections already in place under the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA). For example, while the NLRA permits lower-level employees to freely discuss compensation as protected concerted activity, the new rule expands such protections to supervisors, managers, and applicants as well. As we have discussed before, the NLRB has made it clear it is on the lookout for ways to target employer personnel policies. Similarly, the OFCCP has made it clear that in any desk audit, it will specifically review employee manuals and handbooks and any subcontracts to ensure compliance with the new EEO language regarding pay secrecy prohibition, and encourages employers to distribute the new language to employees as well as re-train management level employees.

The OFCCP’s new rule does provide two defenses for the employer. The first is along the lines of a legitimate business reasons defense: An employer will not violate the rule if the employee violated a workplace rule that is unrelated to the discussion of compensation. For example, if the company has a policy against workplace harassment and an employee is constantly harassing a coworker to inquire about his compensation, the employer may take adverse action and still have a defense to a discrimination complaint filed by the employee.

The second defense applies to employees who maintain personnel records or deal with pay and compensation information as part of his or her essential job function. These employees are not “covered/protected” by the pay secrecy prohibitions if they engage in conduct such as disclosure based on information they acquired in the furtherance of their jobs. Let’s say for example an employee is an internal accountant and one of his essential job functions is to maintain the confidentiality of employee compensation, and he shares the names and pay rates of various employees’ pay. An employer can take an adverse action against the account, and the defense will protect the employer from an assertion that it has violated the new pay secrecy rules.

As with any new rule, it is important for employers to evaluate the impact on their policies and practices and contact legal counsel to confirm their updated practices are in compliance with the new law.

This blog is made available by Foley & Lardner LLP (“Foley” or “the Firm”) for informational purposes only. It is not meant to convey the Firm’s legal position on behalf of any client, nor is it intended to convey specific legal advice. Any opinions expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the views of Foley & Lardner LLP, its partners, or its clients. Accordingly, do not act upon this information without seeking counsel from a licensed attorney. This blog is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Communicating with Foley through this website by email, blog post, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship for any legal matter. Therefore, any communication or material you transmit to Foley through this blog, whether by email, blog post or any other manner, will not be treated as confidential or proprietary. The information on this blog is published “AS IS” and is not guaranteed to be complete, accurate, and or up-to-date. Foley makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, as to the operation or content of the site. Foley expressly disclaims all other guarantees, warranties, conditions and representations of any kind, either express or implied, whether arising under any statute, law, commercial use or otherwise, including implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Foley or any of its partners, officers, employees, agents or affiliates be liable, directly or indirectly, under any theory of law (contract, tort, negligence or otherwise), to you or anyone else, for any claims, losses or damages, direct, indirect special, incidental, punitive or consequential, resulting from or occasioned by the creation, use of or reliance on this site (including information and other content) or any third party websites or the information, resources or material accessed through any such websites. In some jurisdictions, the contents of this blog may be considered Attorney Advertising. If applicable, please note that prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Photographs are for dramatization purposes only and may include models. Likenesses do not necessarily imply current client, partnership or employee status.

Related Services