Rhode Island’s New Law Requires Health Plans Cover Telemedicine Services

19 July 2016 Health Care Law Today Blog
Author(s): Thomas B. Ferrante Nathaniel M. Lacktman

Rhode Island marks the 31st state to enact a telemedicine commercial reimbursement statute. The Telemedicine Coverage Act (HB 7160B) was signed into law by Rhode Island Governor Gina Raimondo on June 28, 2016, representing a forward step for telehealth providers in a state that historically has held one of the lowest-rankings in the nation for telehealth coverage policy. The new law requires commercial health insurers in the Ocean State to cover treatment provided via telemedicine to the same extent the services are covered via in-person care. The law takes effect January 1, 2018 and applies to all policies delivered, issued, or reissued in the State after that date.

The law states as follows:

Each health insurer that issues individual or group accident and sickness insurance policies for health care services and/or provides a health care plan for health care services shall provide coverage for the cost of such covered health care services provided through telemedicine services.  R.I. Gen. Laws §27-81-4(a).

Yet, the law contains some peculiar language that appears to incorporate terms and conditions of a “telemedicine agreement” between the insurer and the participating provider. Whether this will be interpreted as grounds for a health plan to limit coverage based on the terms of such “telemedicine agreement” is not yet known, and we may see further clarity in subsequent rulemaking. Until then, the law provides as follows:

“A health insurer shall not exclude a health care service for coverage solely because the health care service is provided through telemedicine and is not provided through in-person consultation or contact, so long as such health care services are medically appropriate to be provided through telemedicine services and as such may be subject to the terms and conditions of a telemedicine agreement between the insurer and the participating health care provider or provider group” (emphasis added). R.I. Gen. Laws §27-81-4(b).

Other highlights of the new law include the following:

  • The law contains a broad definition of telemedicine, including store & forward, but excluding the use of facsimile, audio-only telephone, electronic mail, or automatic computer programs used for ocular or refractive conditions:
    • Telemedicine means the delivery of clinical health care services by means of real time two-way electronic audiovisual communications, including the application of secure video conferencing or store-and-forward technology to provide or support health care delivery, which facilitate the assessment, diagnosis, treatment, and care management of a patient’s health care while such patient is at an originating site and the health care provider is at a distant site, consistent with applicable federal laws and regulations. Telemedicine does not include an audio-only telephone conversation, email message or facsimile transmission between the provider and patient, or an automated computer program used to diagnose and/or treat ocular or refractive conditions.” R.I. Gen. Laws §27-81-3(12)
  • The law defines the “originating site” as the a site at which a patient is located at the time healthcare services are provided to them by means of telemedicine which can be a patient’s home where medically appropriate. It does not limit originating sites to rural areas or facilities. However, the law includes a curious sentence stating, “health insurers and health care providers may agree to alternative siting arrangements deemed appropriate by the parties.” See R.I. Gen. Laws §27-81-3(9). Hopefully, this language will not be interpreted to permit health insurers to unilaterally impose originating site restrictions via the terms and conditions of the insurer’s “telemedicine agreement.”
  • The statute contains no payment parity language.  In other words, unlike several states (e.g. Delaware, Minnesota, New York), the Rhode Island law does not require health plans to pay providers at the same or equivalent reimbursement rate/basis for identical in-person and telemedicine-based services. Payment parity is an important issue when drafting and considering proposed telehealth coverage bills. We have discussed this extensively in the past, and tackled these matters in connection with our policy and legislative drafting efforts.

With the enactment of Rhode Island’s new law, 31 states plus the District of Columbia have telehealth commercial insurance laws on the books. Continued expansion in coverage and reimbursement means providers can enhance telemedicine offerings, both for the immediate cost savings and growing opportunities for revenue generation, to say nothing of patient quality and satisfaction. Commercial insurance reimbursement is among the five telemedicine trends driving health care transformation in 2016 and beyond. 

We will continue to monitor Rhode Island for any rule changes that affect or improve telemedicine opportunities in the state.

For more information on telemedicine, telehealth, and virtual care innovations, including the team, publications, and other materials, visit Foley’s Telemedicine Practice.

This blog is made available by Foley & Lardner LLP (“Foley” or “the Firm”) for informational purposes only. It is not meant to convey the Firm’s legal position on behalf of any client, nor is it intended to convey specific legal advice. Any opinions expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the views of Foley & Lardner LLP, its partners, or its clients. Accordingly, do not act upon this information without seeking counsel from a licensed attorney. This blog is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Communicating with Foley through this website by email, blog post, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship for any legal matter. Therefore, any communication or material you transmit to Foley through this blog, whether by email, blog post or any other manner, will not be treated as confidential or proprietary. The information on this blog is published “AS IS” and is not guaranteed to be complete, accurate, and or up-to-date. Foley makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, as to the operation or content of the site. Foley expressly disclaims all other guarantees, warranties, conditions and representations of any kind, either express or implied, whether arising under any statute, law, commercial use or otherwise, including implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Foley or any of its partners, officers, employees, agents or affiliates be liable, directly or indirectly, under any theory of law (contract, tort, negligence or otherwise), to you or anyone else, for any claims, losses or damages, direct, indirect special, incidental, punitive or consequential, resulting from or occasioned by the creation, use of or reliance on this site (including information and other content) or any third party websites or the information, resources or material accessed through any such websites. In some jurisdictions, the contents of this blog may be considered Attorney Advertising. If applicable, please note that prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Photographs are for dramatization purposes only and may include models. Likenesses do not necessarily imply current client, partnership or employee status.