Update: Arkansas (Again!) Medical Board Approves Telemedicine Rules

The Arkansas State Medical Board on Thursday voted unanimously to pass Regulation 38 establishing key definitions for telemedicine practice in the State. The new regulation imposes specific Board of Medicine requirements for practicing telemedicine, and is to be read in connection with Regulation No. 2(8) (valid doctor-patient relationships). However, neither regulation addresses the definition of “originating site” under Arkansas Code 17-80-118 or how the Board would apply it to telemedicine consults where the patient is located at his or her home.

The current Arkansas statutory definition of “originating site” reads:

“The offices of a healthcare professional or a licensed healthcare entity where the patient is located at the time services are provided by a healthcare professional through telemedicine; and
The home of a patient in connection with treatment for end-stage renal disease.”

Any change to that definition would likely require a legislative solution, as the Board’s regulations can interpret the law, but do not (and likely cannot) contradict the Code. Regulation 38 expects practitioners to use synchronous audio-video technology, and states “A patient completing a medical history online and forwarding it to a physician is not sufficient to establish the relationship, nor does it qualify as sort-and-forward technology.”

As we reported in August, the Medical Board previously approved proposed Regulation 38 and (allowing a doctor to establish a valid relationship with a patient, without the need for an in-person exam, if the doctor “performs a face to face examination using real time audio and visual telemedicine technology that provides information at least equal to such information as would have been obtained by an in-person examination”). The Arkansas Legislature’s Rules and Regulations subcommittee voted to approve Regulation 2.8 but sent Regulation 38 back to the Medical Board for a new public-comment hearing. Regulation 38 will now go back to the Rules and Regulations subcommittee. If lawmakers approve it, the rule will become effective 10 days after it is sent to Arkansas’ secretary of state’s office.

We will continue to monitor Arkansas for any changes that affect or improve telemedicine opportunities in the state.

For more information on telemedicine, telehealth, and virtual care innovations, including the team, publications, and other materials, visit Foley’s Telemedicine Practice.

This blog is made available by Foley & Lardner LLP (“Foley” or “the Firm”) for informational purposes only. It is not meant to convey the Firm’s legal position on behalf of any client, nor is it intended to convey specific legal advice. Any opinions expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the views of Foley & Lardner LLP, its partners, or its clients. Accordingly, do not act upon this information without seeking counsel from a licensed attorney. This blog is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Communicating with Foley through this website by email, blog post, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship for any legal matter. Therefore, any communication or material you transmit to Foley through this blog, whether by email, blog post or any other manner, will not be treated as confidential or proprietary. The information on this blog is published “AS IS” and is not guaranteed to be complete, accurate, and or up-to-date. Foley makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, as to the operation or content of the site. Foley expressly disclaims all other guarantees, warranties, conditions and representations of any kind, either express or implied, whether arising under any statute, law, commercial use or otherwise, including implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Foley or any of its partners, officers, employees, agents or affiliates be liable, directly or indirectly, under any theory of law (contract, tort, negligence or otherwise), to you or anyone else, for any claims, losses or damages, direct, indirect special, incidental, punitive or consequential, resulting from or occasioned by the creation, use of or reliance on this site (including information and other content) or any third party websites or the information, resources or material accessed through any such websites. In some jurisdictions, the contents of this blog may be considered Attorney Advertising. If applicable, please note that prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Photographs are for dramatization purposes only and may include models. Likenesses do not necessarily imply current client, partnership or employee status.