Simple Steps to Help Keep Your Trade Secrets Safe

09 January 2017 Labor & Employment Law Perspectives Blog

As illustrated by the recent lawsuit by America’s Test Kitchen against celebrity chef Christopher Kimball, companies in a variety of industries are vulnerable to losing their trade secrets.

Although it is a common misconception that trade secret issues usually apply to high-tech companies, every type of business has potential trade secrets. While state laws as to what constitutes a trade secret vary, confidential information, processes, techniques, methods, programs, formulas, patterns, and the like — data that gives a company an edge over its competitors — can potentially constitute a trade secret. In addition to the protections offered by state laws, the recently passed federal Defend Trade Secrets Act also provides new mechanisms to protect against trade secret theft.

To qualify for protection as a trade secret, however, the information at issue must genuinely be a secret — it cannot be known by the competition and cannot be publicly known or available. Additionally, a trade secret must involve a unique process or methodology. Examples of protected information can range from secret recipes to the way a home goods chain organizes its wares or the color schemes used in display windows.

Employers seeking to avoid potential loss of trade secrets should bear in mind the following:

  • Trade secret information must be treated like the valuable information that it is. Courts are unlikely to find that a former employee misappropriated trade secrets, if the company itself did not treat the information as valuable and confidential.
  • Steps to protect your business’s valuable information include: (1) informing employees about the aspects of your business that constitute trade secrets; (2) implementing the use of confidentiality agreements; (3) keeping trade secrets under password protection; (4) marking documents that are or include trade secrets “confidential”; (5) limiting access to trade secrets to only those who need the information in order to do their jobs; and (6) implementing policies that make clear that employees have no expectation of privacy on company devices.
  • Employers must also be proactive in monitoring departing employees, including: (1) requesting that the employee turn over all confidential information in their possession; (2) requiring prompt return of all company-issued computers, phones, and other devices; and (3) requiring departing employees sign a “termination certificate” stating under penalty of perjury that they have not taken any trade secrets. When in doubt over a departing employee’s actions, consider a forensic analysis of their company-provided hardware in order to ensure that valuable information has not been misappropriated. The key is to take prompt reasonable steps to protect the confidential information.
  • When it appears that an employee has engaged in trade secret theft, the employer should take prompt action, including sending a cease-and-desist order followed by prompt legal action, if necessary. Failure to take action in one circumstance may undercut future claims against employees who steal similar trade secrets. In other words, a court may conclude that if the information at issue is indeed valuable and secret, the company would have sought to enforce its rights the first time.

Finally, make sure your employee contracts and similar documents outlining employees’ confidentiality obligations are up to date an enforceable.

This blog is made available by Foley & Lardner LLP (“Foley” or “the Firm”) for informational purposes only. It is not meant to convey the Firm’s legal position on behalf of any client, nor is it intended to convey specific legal advice. Any opinions expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the views of Foley & Lardner LLP, its partners, or its clients. Accordingly, do not act upon this information without seeking counsel from a licensed attorney. This blog is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Communicating with Foley through this website by email, blog post, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship for any legal matter. Therefore, any communication or material you transmit to Foley through this blog, whether by email, blog post or any other manner, will not be treated as confidential or proprietary. The information on this blog is published “AS IS” and is not guaranteed to be complete, accurate, and or up-to-date. Foley makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, as to the operation or content of the site. Foley expressly disclaims all other guarantees, warranties, conditions and representations of any kind, either express or implied, whether arising under any statute, law, commercial use or otherwise, including implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Foley or any of its partners, officers, employees, agents or affiliates be liable, directly or indirectly, under any theory of law (contract, tort, negligence or otherwise), to you or anyone else, for any claims, losses or damages, direct, indirect special, incidental, punitive or consequential, resulting from or occasioned by the creation, use of or reliance on this site (including information and other content) or any third party websites or the information, resources or material accessed through any such websites. In some jurisdictions, the contents of this blog may be considered Attorney Advertising. If applicable, please note that prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Photographs are for dramatization purposes only and may include models. Likenesses do not necessarily imply current client, partnership or employee status.

Related Services

Insights

RCE PTA Carve-Out Resumes After Interference
18 September 2019
PharmaPatents
The Ninth Circuit Expected to Rule that Doctors Can Be Wrong in the Winter v. Gardens False Claims Act Case
18 September 2019
Legal News: Government Enforcement Defense & Investigations
Upcoming Webinar: Maximizing Solar Tax Credits - Navigating the Start of Construction Rules (Part 1)
17 September 2019
Renewable Energy Outlook
When Birds Finally Find a Nest
17 September 2019
Dashboard Insights
Lacktman, Ferrante Cited in mHealth Intelligence About Ryan Haight Act
19 September 2019
mHealth Intelligence
Tinnen Discusses How Viewpoint Diversity Helps Businesses Thrive
18 September 2019
InsideTrack
Vernaglia Comments on AHA v Azar Decision
18 September 2019
MedPage Today
Lach Comments on Launch of New Group
16 September 2019
BizTimes Milwaukee
MedTech Impact Expo & Conference
13-15 December 2019
Las Vegas, NV
Review of 2020 Medicare Changes for Telehealth
11 December 2019
Member Call
BRG Healthcare Leadership Conference
06 December 2019
Washington, D.C.
CTeL Telehealth Fall Summit 2019
04-06 December 2019
Washington, D.C.