TSCA Amendment: Upcoming Inventory Rule

On June 22, 2016, the Frank R. Lautenberg Chemical Safety for the 21^st Century Act (the Amendment), which amends the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA), was signed into law. Under this amendment, EPA was authorized, amongst other things, to evaluate its existing inventory of chemical substances on specific timelines. The proposed rule – the Inventory Rule –will require manufacturers to notify EPA of chemicals manufactured and processed in the past 10 years. EPA will use this information to update the TSCA inventory of chemical substances, and to determine which chemicals are active and still being manufactured and processed and which chemicals are “inactive” in commerce. The purpose of the update to the TSCA inventory is to better position the agency to set priorities for risk evaluations.

The EPA notification requirement is triggered by EPA’s publication of the final rule, which the TSCA amendments provide must be completed by June 2017 (the Inventory Rule). Pursuant to the Amendment and under the proposed Inventory Rule, domestic manufacturers and chemical importers will have 180 days after the final Inventory Rule is published to tell the EPA which chemical substances they have made or imported in the prior 10 years. The Amendment also contemplates notification by U.S. companies that process chemical substances, and who would have up to one year after the Inventory Rule is published to do so.

Recently, several companies and associations asked the EPA to give importers of chemical mixtures more time, up to one year, to complete the required notification. However, allowing this additional time is not considered under the Amendment, and it is not clear whether the agency has the authority to provide the additional time.

Companies that manufacture and import chemical substances should be aware that this inventory rule is coming and plan accordingly. As a best practice, proactively reaching out to your supply chains in order to create a current, accurate inventory will expedite and ease compliance with the Inventory Rule.

This blog is made available by Foley & Lardner LLP (“Foley” or “the Firm”) for informational purposes only. It is not meant to convey the Firm’s legal position on behalf of any client, nor is it intended to convey specific legal advice. Any opinions expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the views of Foley & Lardner LLP, its partners, or its clients. Accordingly, do not act upon this information without seeking counsel from a licensed attorney. This blog is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Communicating with Foley through this website by email, blog post, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship for any legal matter. Therefore, any communication or material you transmit to Foley through this blog, whether by email, blog post or any other manner, will not be treated as confidential or proprietary. The information on this blog is published “AS IS” and is not guaranteed to be complete, accurate, and or up-to-date. Foley makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, as to the operation or content of the site. Foley expressly disclaims all other guarantees, warranties, conditions and representations of any kind, either express or implied, whether arising under any statute, law, commercial use or otherwise, including implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Foley or any of its partners, officers, employees, agents or affiliates be liable, directly or indirectly, under any theory of law (contract, tort, negligence or otherwise), to you or anyone else, for any claims, losses or damages, direct, indirect special, incidental, punitive or consequential, resulting from or occasioned by the creation, use of or reliance on this site (including information and other content) or any third party websites or the information, resources or material accessed through any such websites. In some jurisdictions, the contents of this blog may be considered Attorney Advertising. If applicable, please note that prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Photographs are for dramatization purposes only and may include models. Likenesses do not necessarily imply current client, partnership or employee status.