Attorney Jack Haake penned an article, “In Tronox, 2nd Circ. Sends Clear Message About Injunctions,” analyzing what the In re Tronox Inc., No. 16-343, (2d Cir. Apr. 20, 2017) decision means for entities that don’t agree with how the court is evaluating their bankruptcy injunctions.
Haake’s article thoroughly examines the decision and explains that, per the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit’s decision, “entities dissatisfied with a district court’s interpretation of an injunction must choose either to comply with the injunction as interpreted by the district court or risk sanctions if they believe the district court erred.”
Haake’s article thoroughly examines the decision and explains that, per the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit’s decision, “entities dissatisfied with a district court’s interpretation of an injunction must choose either to comply with the injunction as interpreted by the district court or risk sanctions if they believe the district court erred.”
Related Insights
July 25, 2025
Foley Viewpoints
Thorny Laws That ICHRA Vendors Should Consider, Part Three: FinTech Edition
We continue our series on the legal and regulatory challenges facing individual coverage health reimbursement arrangements (ICHRAs); this…
July 24, 2025
Manufacturing Industry Advisor
Foley Automotive Update
Analysis by Julie Dautermann, Competitive Intelligence Analyst Foley is here to help you through all aspects of rethinking your long-term…
July 23, 2025
Foley Viewpoints
The One Big Beautiful Bill and Workplace Immigration Enforcement
The “One Big Beautiful Bill Act,” signed into law by President Trump on July 4, 2025, will fund government efforts to continue to…