Attorney Jack Haake penned an article, “In Tronox, 2nd Circ. Sends Clear Message About Injunctions,” analyzing what the In re Tronox Inc., No. 16-343, (2d Cir. Apr. 20, 2017) decision means for entities that don’t agree with how the court is evaluating their bankruptcy injunctions.
Haake’s article thoroughly examines the decision and explains that, per the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit’s decision, “entities dissatisfied with a district court’s interpretation of an injunction must choose either to comply with the injunction as interpreted by the district court or risk sanctions if they believe the district court erred.”
Haake’s article thoroughly examines the decision and explains that, per the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit’s decision, “entities dissatisfied with a district court’s interpretation of an injunction must choose either to comply with the injunction as interpreted by the district court or risk sanctions if they believe the district court erred.”
Related Insights
21 May 2025
Tariff & International Trade Resource
What Every Multinational Company Should Know About … Customs Enforcement and False Claims Act Risks (Part III)
We complete the series on “Customs Enforcement and False Claims Act Risks” with Part III, which focuses on preparing for the most common FCA risks arising from improper management of import operations.
02 June 2025
Events
Biotech Panel Discussion & Happy Hour
Join Foley & Lardner LLP along with Biotech XYZ for an engaging evening event featuring a dynamic panel discussion and a lively happy hour.
03 June 2025
Events
Biotech Breakfast + Office Hours
Join Foley & Lardner LLP along with Biotech XYZ for Phase Capitals’ flagship networking biotech breakfast and office hours with Q&A sessions.