Attorney Jack Haake penned an article, “In Tronox, 2nd Circ. Sends Clear Message About Injunctions,” analyzing what the In re Tronox Inc., No. 16-343, (2d Cir. Apr. 20, 2017) decision means for entities that don’t agree with how the court is evaluating their bankruptcy injunctions.
Haake’s article thoroughly examines the decision and explains that, per the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit’s decision, “entities dissatisfied with a district court’s interpretation of an injunction must choose either to comply with the injunction as interpreted by the district court or risk sanctions if they believe the district court erred.”
Haake’s article thoroughly examines the decision and explains that, per the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit’s decision, “entities dissatisfied with a district court’s interpretation of an injunction must choose either to comply with the injunction as interpreted by the district court or risk sanctions if they believe the district court erred.”
Related Insights
June 6, 2025
Energy Current
House Bill 3809 Adds Obligations to Battery Energy Storage Lessees in Texas
On May 29, 2025, House Bill No. 3809 was signed into law by Texas Governor Greg Abbott. Born out of a crop of bills regulating renewable…
June 23, 2025
Events
Third Annual Transaction Solutions Symposium
Foley & Lardner is sponsoring the Third Annual Transaction Solutions Symposium — a premier conference focused on de-risking strategies that enhance deal execution and business outcomes. Rishi Sodhi will be speaking as part of the Tax Liability Insurance: Current Trends, Controversies and Claims panel.
June 5, 2025
Health Care Law Today
GLP-1 Compounded Medications Targeted by Connecticut Attorney General
On May 21, 2025, the Connecticut Office of the Attorney General released a statement and sent letters to Connecticut weight loss clinics, med spas, medical practices and other businesses regarding allegedly or potentially unfair and deceptive conduct relating to compounded GLP-1 medications.