NLRB: Nonunion Employees Do Not Have A Right To A Co-Worker’s Presence During Investigatory Interviews

22 May 2017 Labor & Employment Law Perspectives Blog

As we have frequently reminded our readers, even non-unionized employers need to pay close attention to the National Labor Relations Board’s (NLRB) rulings and opinions as to employees’ rights under applicable labor law. For example, the NLRB has focused on employee handbook provisions – applicable to both union and non-union employers, which it considers to be in violation of the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA).

A recent Board opinion, however, demonstrates that there are circumstances where the Board will decline to extend certain rights to nonunion employees. Specifically, the Board has determined that so-called Weingarten rights do not apply to nonunion employees. Weingarten rights enable union workers to insist on having a representative present during investigatory interviews that could reasonably result in discipline. Pursuant to the NLRB’s recent ruling, however, nonunion employees do not have a right to request that a co-worker or representative be present during such interviews.

Weingarten rights derive their name from a 1975 U.S. Supreme Court decision called NLRB v. J. Weingarten Inc. The NLRB has changed its stance over the years on whether Weingarten rights extend to nonunion workplaces. For example, in a 2000 decision, Epilepsy Foundation of Ohio, the Board held that nonunionized workers did, indeed, have a right to representation during investigatory interviews. However, in a 2004 case, the Board held that employees at nonunionized workplaces do not have the right to ask for a co-worker to be present during such interviews. Specifically, the Board found that the right of a nonunion employee to a co-worker’s presence was outweighed by an employer’s right to conduct prompt, efficient, thorough, and confidential workplace investigations.

Last November, Charles Strickler, a former Board attorney, petitioned the NLRB to reverse its stance and again find that Weingarten rights apply to nonunion employees.  However, in its May 4 opinion, the Board unanimously declined to issue a new rule on Weingarten rights.   Although the Board may change its stance regarding Weingarten rights in the future, its recent unanimous decision means that at least for the time being, nonunion employees do not have the right to a co-worker’s presence during investigatory interviews.

Employers, however, should bear in mind that there are many other NLRA protections that extend to nonunionized workers, including protections associated with “protected concerted activity” which includes co-workers talking with other co-workers about wages, benefits, working conditions and participating in a concerted refusal to work in unsafe conditions, among others. Employers are, therefore, well advised to pay attention to NLRB rulings on this and other matters.

This blog is made available by Foley & Lardner LLP (“Foley” or “the Firm”) for informational purposes only. It is not meant to convey the Firm’s legal position on behalf of any client, nor is it intended to convey specific legal advice. Any opinions expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the views of Foley & Lardner LLP, its partners, or its clients. Accordingly, do not act upon this information without seeking counsel from a licensed attorney. This blog is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Communicating with Foley through this website by email, blog post, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship for any legal matter. Therefore, any communication or material you transmit to Foley through this blog, whether by email, blog post or any other manner, will not be treated as confidential or proprietary. The information on this blog is published “AS IS” and is not guaranteed to be complete, accurate, and or up-to-date. Foley makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, as to the operation or content of the site. Foley expressly disclaims all other guarantees, warranties, conditions and representations of any kind, either express or implied, whether arising under any statute, law, commercial use or otherwise, including implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Foley or any of its partners, officers, employees, agents or affiliates be liable, directly or indirectly, under any theory of law (contract, tort, negligence or otherwise), to you or anyone else, for any claims, losses or damages, direct, indirect special, incidental, punitive or consequential, resulting from or occasioned by the creation, use of or reliance on this site (including information and other content) or any third party websites or the information, resources or material accessed through any such websites. In some jurisdictions, the contents of this blog may be considered Attorney Advertising. If applicable, please note that prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Photographs are for dramatization purposes only and may include models. Likenesses do not necessarily imply current client, partnership or employee status.

Related Services