EPA Ends 20 Year “Once In, Always In” Policy for MACT Standards: May Effect Enforcement, New Permits

29 January 2018 Manufacturing Industry Advisor Blog
Authors: Peter A. Tomasi Mark A. Thimke

In a major change in air permitting policy, on January 25, 2018 U.S. EPA reversed its longstanding “once in, always in” policy governing what sources are subject to major source regulations for the emissions of  air toxics under Section 112 of the Clean Air Act.  Under a 1995 policy memorandum issued by the agency, sources that had the potential to emit above the major source thresholds at the time a standard applied to a particular source category were “always in,” and had to forever comply with that standard—even if the source subsequently installed emission control equipment or switched to non-hazardous air pollutant substances, and took enforceable limits to keep emissions below those limits. The January 25 memorandum reverses that policy, and authorizes the reclassification of a major source to an area source at such time as the source takes enforceable limits on potential to emit below the major source thresholds.

This change will likely lead to numerous sources seeking reclassification from “major” to “area” source status, in order to take advantage of more streamlined recordkeeping and reporting requirements applicable to such facilities.  It may also have implications for some enforcement cases currently being pursued by the agency. States have incorporated the federal major source requirements into air permits, and as such, the requirements remain in effect until the permit is modified.  Facilities should review their air permits and work with state agencies to remove the unnecessary and burdensome requirements.

This blog is made available by Foley & Lardner LLP (“Foley” or “the Firm”) for informational purposes only. It is not meant to convey the Firm’s legal position on behalf of any client, nor is it intended to convey specific legal advice. Any opinions expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the views of Foley & Lardner LLP, its partners, or its clients. Accordingly, do not act upon this information without seeking counsel from a licensed attorney. This blog is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Communicating with Foley through this website by email, blog post, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship for any legal matter. Therefore, any communication or material you transmit to Foley through this blog, whether by email, blog post or any other manner, will not be treated as confidential or proprietary. The information on this blog is published “AS IS” and is not guaranteed to be complete, accurate, and or up-to-date. Foley makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, as to the operation or content of the site. Foley expressly disclaims all other guarantees, warranties, conditions and representations of any kind, either express or implied, whether arising under any statute, law, commercial use or otherwise, including implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Foley or any of its partners, officers, employees, agents or affiliates be liable, directly or indirectly, under any theory of law (contract, tort, negligence or otherwise), to you or anyone else, for any claims, losses or damages, direct, indirect special, incidental, punitive or consequential, resulting from or occasioned by the creation, use of or reliance on this site (including information and other content) or any third party websites or the information, resources or material accessed through any such websites. In some jurisdictions, the contents of this blog may be considered Attorney Advertising. If applicable, please note that prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Photographs are for dramatization purposes only and may include models. Likenesses do not necessarily imply current client, partnership or employee status.

Related Services