Important Considerations in Selecting the Right Mediator

07 February 2018 Manufacturing Industry Advisor Blog
Authors: Christopher L. Griffin

One of the fundamental components of a mediation is, of course, the mediator. Continuing the Manufacturing Industry Advisor’s series on mediation, we discuss how to select the right mediator for resolution of your dispute. Selecting the right mediator may well mean the difference between a great settlement or facing continued, expensive litigation.

Once mediation is on the horizon, a mediator must be selected so the parties, their counsel, and the mediator can identify a mutually acceptable date, time, and place.  Unless the court orders the parties to use a specific mediator, which happens occasionally, the parties and their counsel negotiate and select a mediator.  Several factors influence which mediator is the right fit for a particular dispute.

  • Subject Matter Expertise. Does the dispute involve a competitor’s advertisements in claims based on, among others, the Lanham Act or trade dress infringement?  Is the case intensely scientific because of the intellectual property involved?  These are just two examples of subject matter that would be very difficult for a mediator to handle if he or she does not have the right experience.  However, in many cases, no special knowledge is necessary for the mediator to be effective.
  • Mediator’s Style: Active vs. Passive. Active mediators strategically facilitate resolutions.  They press both sides on points of contention in the dispute, and often suggest potential proposals.  Passive mediators, on the other hand, do little to assist the parties.  These mediators tend to work as mere conduits, simply carrying messages from one room to the next. (While active mediators often make litigants feel that they are not neutral, understand that the mediator is pushing both sides on the weaknesses of their case.)
  • Mediator’s Biases. Mediators undergo extensive training to remain neutral in a dispute.  Your counsel’s familiarity with a given mediator is a plus, especially in evaluating the above points, but do not count on it “giving you an edge” in the mediation.  In fact, the mediator is not trying to reach a result that he or she deems correct.  Rather, the mediator’s role is none other than to bring the parties to a result which they  All that said, if a mediator is known to be biased in any way, cross that person off the list.
  • Mediator’s Rate. Importantly, in most commercial disputes, the mediator’s rate should not be a factor in the decision making process.  As any litigant can attest, attorneys, experts, and other litigation expenses cost substantial sums.  Mediators’ fees do not add significantly to litigation costs, especially because the parties almost always split the mediation fees.  Consider the following examples:
1 Day Mediation in a Mid-Market
 Mediator A Mediator B 
 Rate $325/hr $575/hr
 Hours 8  8
 Total Fee  $2,600 $4,600
 Each Side’s Share $1,300 $2,300

While the hourly rates may seem materially different, the difference in total cost probably is immaterial.  And the cost is usually worth it: First, if the parties reach an agreement, the dispute is behind them, and future costs are avoided.  Second, even if the parties do not settle, an experienced mediator may be able to correct erroneous views held by your opponent or its attorney, which can help focus the actual issues that remain to be litigated.  Simply put, marginal cost ($1,000) in these mediators likely pales in comparison to marginal benefit ($10Ks or $100Ks in exposure or attorneys’ fees) that are saved when a resolution is reached.

Discuss with your lawyer the following questions regarding each mediator:

  • What experience do you have with this mediator? How many times have you participated in mediations with this mediator?
  • What is the mediator’s background? Does he or she have experience in the subject matter presented in this case?
  • Is this mediator relatively active or passive? Do you trust this mediator to be fair?
  • What were the outcomes of the mediations in which you previously participated with this mediator?
  • Would you recommend that we use this mediator? Why or why not?

Working with your counsel to select the best mediator possible is well worth the time and expense.  In the end, it could save you a significant amount of money and stress.  Stay tuned for our next post explaining how you should help your attorney prepare for mediation, once the date has been set and the mediator has been selected.

This blog is made available by Foley & Lardner LLP (“Foley” or “the Firm”) for informational purposes only. It is not meant to convey the Firm’s legal position on behalf of any client, nor is it intended to convey specific legal advice. Any opinions expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the views of Foley & Lardner LLP, its partners, or its clients. Accordingly, do not act upon this information without seeking counsel from a licensed attorney. This blog is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Communicating with Foley through this website by email, blog post, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship for any legal matter. Therefore, any communication or material you transmit to Foley through this blog, whether by email, blog post or any other manner, will not be treated as confidential or proprietary. The information on this blog is published “AS IS” and is not guaranteed to be complete, accurate, and or up-to-date. Foley makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, as to the operation or content of the site. Foley expressly disclaims all other guarantees, warranties, conditions and representations of any kind, either express or implied, whether arising under any statute, law, commercial use or otherwise, including implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Foley or any of its partners, officers, employees, agents or affiliates be liable, directly or indirectly, under any theory of law (contract, tort, negligence or otherwise), to you or anyone else, for any claims, losses or damages, direct, indirect special, incidental, punitive or consequential, resulting from or occasioned by the creation, use of or reliance on this site (including information and other content) or any third party websites or the information, resources or material accessed through any such websites. In some jurisdictions, the contents of this blog may be considered Attorney Advertising. If applicable, please note that prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Photographs are for dramatization purposes only and may include models. Likenesses do not necessarily imply current client, partnership or employee status.

Related Services