OFCCP Signals Emphasis on “Religious Liberty” in Federal Contractor Compliance

20 August 2018 Labor & Employment Law Perspectives Blog
Author(s): Scott T. Allen

On August 10, the Department of Labor’s Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs (OFCCP) issued a new policy directive aimed at protecting the religious freedom of employees and ensuring a “level playing field” for religious organizations to compete for federal contracts.

While the 2014 Obama administration rule prohibiting discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity remains intact, the OFCCP will be updating its FAQ page on the “Religious Employers and Religious Exemption” as the previous content is no longer valid.

The new guidance is likely to expand the scope of federal contractors that are exempt from the prohibition on discrimination against employees and applicants based on sexual orientation and gender identity, and LGBTQ advocacy organizations have criticized the directive as a “license to discriminate.”

The OFCCP states that the directive is intended to update federal policy to incorporate recent developments in the law articulated in Supreme Court decisions, including Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc. That case, decided in 2014, held that for-profit closely held corporations are protected under the Religious Freedom Restoration Act and can object to certain legal requirements on religious grounds. In its June 2018 Masterpiece Cakeshop, Ltd. v. Colo. Civil Rights Comm’n opinion, the Supreme Court also held that a Colorado civil rights agency that investigated a Christian baker’s refusal to make cakes for same-sex weddings violated the First Amendment’s Free Exercise Clause by demonstrating hostility to his religious beliefs. (The same baker filed a lawsuit against a number of Colorado officials on August 14 over an investigation of his refusal to make a cake celebrating an individual’s gender transition.)

This directive is the latest step in the Trump administration’s focus on “religious freedom” and will likely lead to more contractors being able to rely on religious reasons to avoid non-discrimination obligations. This move is part of a broader effort to encourage more religious organizations and businesses to obtain federal contracts.

When processing complaints, conducting audits, and engaging in other enforcement activity, the new directive reminds OFFCP staff that:

  • They “cannot act in a manner that passes judgment upon or presupposes the illegitimacy of religious beliefs and practices” and must “proceed in a manner neutral toward and tolerant of . . . religious beliefs.”
  • They cannot “condition the availability of [opportunities] upon a recipient’s willingness to surrender his [or her] religiously impelled status.”
  • “[A] federal regulation’s restriction on the activities of a for-profit closely held corporation must comply with [the Religious Freedom Restoration Act].”
  • They must permit “faith-based and community organizations, to the fullest opportunity permitted by law, to compete on a level playing field for . . . [Federal] contracts.”
  • They must respect the right of “religious people and institutions . . . to practice their faith without fear of discrimination or retaliation by the Federal Government.”

It remains to be seen how far this general guidance will go in changing the OFCCP’s compliance activities. In the meantime, it is important for federal contractors – like all employers – to avoid discrimination based on employees’ and applicants’ actual or suspected religious beliefs, and to accommodate their religious observances and practices unless doing so would impose an undue hardship.

This blog is made available by Foley & Lardner LLP (“Foley” or “the Firm”) for informational purposes only. It is not meant to convey the Firm’s legal position on behalf of any client, nor is it intended to convey specific legal advice. Any opinions expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the views of Foley & Lardner LLP, its partners, or its clients. Accordingly, do not act upon this information without seeking counsel from a licensed attorney. This blog is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Communicating with Foley through this website by email, blog post, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship for any legal matter. Therefore, any communication or material you transmit to Foley through this blog, whether by email, blog post or any other manner, will not be treated as confidential or proprietary. The information on this blog is published “AS IS” and is not guaranteed to be complete, accurate, and or up-to-date. Foley makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, as to the operation or content of the site. Foley expressly disclaims all other guarantees, warranties, conditions and representations of any kind, either express or implied, whether arising under any statute, law, commercial use or otherwise, including implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Foley or any of its partners, officers, employees, agents or affiliates be liable, directly or indirectly, under any theory of law (contract, tort, negligence or otherwise), to you or anyone else, for any claims, losses or damages, direct, indirect special, incidental, punitive or consequential, resulting from or occasioned by the creation, use of or reliance on this site (including information and other content) or any third party websites or the information, resources or material accessed through any such websites. In some jurisdictions, the contents of this blog may be considered Attorney Advertising. If applicable, please note that prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Photographs are for dramatization purposes only and may include models. Likenesses do not necessarily imply current client, partnership or employee status.


Related Services