New Lactation Room Laws In New York City

05 November 2018 Labor & Employment Law Perspectives Blog
Authors: Jessica E. Joseph

The New York City Council just passed two bills that will require employers to provide lactation rooms to breastfeeding employees, as well as develop a lactation policy and processes for employees to request accommodations for nursing.

The first bill, Int. No. 879-A, amends the administrative code of the City of New York to require employers to provide a “lactation room” for employees needing to express breastmilk. The lactation room must be a sanitary place, other than a restroom, where employees can express breastmilk “shielded from view and free from intrusion.” At a minimum, the room must include an electrical outlet, a chair, a surface on which a breast pump and other personal items can be placed, and nearby access to running water. In addition, both the lactation room and a refrigerator suitable for breast milk storage should be in reasonable proximity to the breastfeeding employee(s)’ work area.

While the lactation room may be an existing room that is used for other purposes, its sole function must be as a lactation room while an employee is using it to express breastmilk. If an employee is using the room to express milk, the employer is required to notify other employees that the room is given preference for use as a lactation room. If providing a lactation room poses an “undue hardship” for an employer, the employer must engage in a cooperative dialogue with the breastfeeding employee. This dialogue, whether orally or in writing, is intended to determine what alternative accommodation(s) might be available. The cooperative dialogue process should result in a written final determination given to the employee identifying any accommodation(s) that were granted or denied.

The second of the two bills, Int. No. 905-A, requires that employers implement a written lactation room policy and provide a copy to all new hires. The policy must notify employees that they have the right to a lactation room, and describe a process by which employees may request use of a lactation room. Notably, the bill does not require that the policy be distributed to current employees.

The process for requesting the use of a lactation room must:

  1. Specify the means by which an employee may submit such a request
  2. Require the employer to respond within a “reasonable” amount of time, not to exceed five business days
  3. Provide a procedure to follow when two or more individuals need to use the room at the same time, including contact information for any required follow up
  4. State that the employer shall provide reasonable break time for an employee to express breast milk pursuant to Section 206-c of the New York Labor Law; and
  5. State that if the request for a lactation room poses an undue hardship on the employer, the employer shall engage in a cooperative dialogue

The bill instructs the New York City Commission on Human Rights to develop a model lactation room accommodation policy, in addition to a model lactation room request form, to assist employers in complying with the new law.

Both of these new laws will become effective 120 days after the Mayor signs the bills, which he is expected to do in the near future.

Employers in New York City should review their policies and procedures in order to ensure compliance with these new laws. And the city’s laws provide a reminder for employers throughout the country to make sure that their policies and procedures satisfy the Affordable Care Act’s protections for nursing mothers, as well as any applicable state or local law.

This blog is made available by Foley & Lardner LLP (“Foley” or “the Firm”) for informational purposes only. It is not meant to convey the Firm’s legal position on behalf of any client, nor is it intended to convey specific legal advice. Any opinions expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the views of Foley & Lardner LLP, its partners, or its clients. Accordingly, do not act upon this information without seeking counsel from a licensed attorney. This blog is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Communicating with Foley through this website by email, blog post, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship for any legal matter. Therefore, any communication or material you transmit to Foley through this blog, whether by email, blog post or any other manner, will not be treated as confidential or proprietary. The information on this blog is published “AS IS” and is not guaranteed to be complete, accurate, and or up-to-date. Foley makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, as to the operation or content of the site. Foley expressly disclaims all other guarantees, warranties, conditions and representations of any kind, either express or implied, whether arising under any statute, law, commercial use or otherwise, including implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Foley or any of its partners, officers, employees, agents or affiliates be liable, directly or indirectly, under any theory of law (contract, tort, negligence or otherwise), to you or anyone else, for any claims, losses or damages, direct, indirect special, incidental, punitive or consequential, resulting from or occasioned by the creation, use of or reliance on this site (including information and other content) or any third party websites or the information, resources or material accessed through any such websites. In some jurisdictions, the contents of this blog may be considered Attorney Advertising. If applicable, please note that prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Photographs are for dramatization purposes only and may include models. Likenesses do not necessarily imply current client, partnership or employee status.

Related Services

Insights

California Statute Offers Dramatic Change to Independent Contractor, Franchise-Franchisee Relationships
20 September 2019
Legal News: Distribution & Franchise
AI Ouch! AI Job Interview Law Starting in 2020!
20 September 2019
Internet, IT & e-Discovery Blog
RCE PTA Carve-Out Resumes After Interference
18 September 2019
PharmaPatents
The Ninth Circuit Expected to Rule that Doctors Can Be Wrong in the Winter v. Gardens False Claims Act Case
18 September 2019
Legal News: Government Enforcement Defense & Investigations
Lacktman, Ferrante Cited in mHealth Intelligence About Ryan Haight Act
19 September 2019
mHealth Intelligence
Vernaglia Comments on AHA v Azar Decision
18 September 2019
MedPage Today
Tinnen Discusses How Viewpoint Diversity Helps Businesses Thrive
18 September 2019
InsideTrack
Lach Comments on Launch of New Group
16 September 2019
BizTimes Milwaukee
MedTech Impact Expo & Conference
13-15 December 2019
Las Vegas, NV
Review of 2020 Medicare Changes for Telehealth
11 December 2019
Member Call
BRG Healthcare Leadership Conference
06 December 2019
Washington, D.C.
CTeL Telehealth Fall Summit 2019
04-06 December 2019
Washington, D.C.