Your Get of Out Jail Free Card: Tips to Avoid Pitfalls Under the Texas Wage Theft Act

22 January 2019 Labor & Employment Law Perspectives Blog
Authors: Michael (Mike) R. Rahmn

In the classic version of the iconic board game Monopoly, “Monopoly Jail” is the first corner space after “Go.” When playing the game, no one really wants to be sent to jail, as it immediately takes away your turn and ends your ability to keep collecting money and property.

The same is true about your “work life.” Almost no one wants to go to jail because of their work. But federal, state, and local governments continue to enact laws that potentially send employers to jail for doing bad things—like engaging in wage theft.

Wage theft occurs when an employer fails to pay its workers as agreed, when workers are paid less than the minimum wage, when workers are required to work “off the clock,” and when workers are not properly paid for their overtime work. Each year, wage theft impacts millions of workers to the tune of tens of billions of dollars. In addition, employers who properly pay their employees are at a competitive disadvantage to employers who do not.

To combat these injustices, the Texas legislature, following the lead of a number of other states with wage theft laws, such as California and New York, passed the Texas Wage Theft Act (the “Act”). Among other things, the Act makes the nonpayment of wages a third-degree felony and allows for criminal prosecution for wage theft if, with the intent to avoid payment, an employer fails to make full payment after receiving a demand for wages. The Act also closes a well-known loophole that allowed employers to evade prosecution by paying only a fraction of what they owed employees. In addition to jail time, employers may be ordered to pay a fine as well as restitution to the aggrieved employee. The act allows for private lawsuits, and affected employees are not required to file complaints with the Texas Workforce Commission of the Department of Labor before initiating those lawsuits.

The Act is one of the most aggressive mechanisms to counter wage theft, but it is not the only one. Cities like El Paso and Houston have enacted ordinances that prohibit employers who commit wage theft from receiving potentially lucrative city contracts and/or city permits. On the federal side, an Obama-era executive order, which was recently repealed by President Trump, in part discouraged businesses from committing wage theft by not allowing them to receive federal contracts.

The consequences for wage theft are severe, but there are a number of ways in which employers can be mindful of the pitfalls that lead to wage theft. First, at an absolute minimum, employers everywhere should ensure they are in compliance with the federal Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), which establishes, among other things, the minimum wage and overtime pay eligibility. Second, employers should also make sure that individuals who perform services for the entity are properly classified as employees or independent contractors. Third, employers should keep detailed and accurate records of their employees, including but not limited to, the hours an employee works in a work week, the employee’s rate of pay, the total amount of pay for the period as well as any deductions made.

Finally, employers should pay their employees in full when wages are due, particularly a separating or separated employee. In Texas, for example, an employee who is separated from work for a reason other than discharge must be paid in full not later than the next regularly scheduled payday. Discharged employees must be paid in full not later than the sixth (6th) day after termination. When and how often employees must be paid varies from state to state, so make sure you are in compliance with the laws in your state.

This blog is made available by Foley & Lardner LLP (“Foley” or “the Firm”) for informational purposes only. It is not meant to convey the Firm’s legal position on behalf of any client, nor is it intended to convey specific legal advice. Any opinions expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the views of Foley & Lardner LLP, its partners, or its clients. Accordingly, do not act upon this information without seeking counsel from a licensed attorney. This blog is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Communicating with Foley through this website by email, blog post, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship for any legal matter. Therefore, any communication or material you transmit to Foley through this blog, whether by email, blog post or any other manner, will not be treated as confidential or proprietary. The information on this blog is published “AS IS” and is not guaranteed to be complete, accurate, and or up-to-date. Foley makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, as to the operation or content of the site. Foley expressly disclaims all other guarantees, warranties, conditions and representations of any kind, either express or implied, whether arising under any statute, law, commercial use or otherwise, including implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Foley or any of its partners, officers, employees, agents or affiliates be liable, directly or indirectly, under any theory of law (contract, tort, negligence or otherwise), to you or anyone else, for any claims, losses or damages, direct, indirect special, incidental, punitive or consequential, resulting from or occasioned by the creation, use of or reliance on this site (including information and other content) or any third party websites or the information, resources or material accessed through any such websites. In some jurisdictions, the contents of this blog may be considered Attorney Advertising. If applicable, please note that prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Photographs are for dramatization purposes only and may include models. Likenesses do not necessarily imply current client, partnership or employee status.

Related Services

Insights

Bad Holiday Season News! Estimates of an increase of Cyberattacks 20%!
13 December 2019
Internet, IT & e-Discovery Blog
Driving the Future of Automotive Technology
12 December 2019
Manufacturing Industry Advisor
Massachusetts Governor Proposes Facility Fee Ban
12 December 2019
Health Care Law Today
American Rule Prevails; PTO May Not Collect In-House Attorneys' Fees as "Expenses"
12 December 2019
IP Litigation Current
ACCC 46th Annual Meeting & Cancer Center Business Summit
04-05 March 2020
Washington, D.C.
Foley/Deloitte Compliance and Privacy Officer Roundtable
27 February 2020
Boston, MA
Let’s Talk Compliance
24 January 2020
Orlando, FL
New England Alliance Annual Meeting
15-17 January 2020
Woodstock, VT