Get Off My Lawn! Employers Gain Expanded Rights to Keep Unions Away from Their Property

18 November 2019 Blog
Authors: Jessica Glatzer Mason
Published To: Labor & Employment Law Perspectives Dashboard Insights

The National Labor Relations Board (NLRB or the “Board”) has been steadily increasing employers’ rights to restrict union access to their facilities. Now the Board appears poised to codify the new rules of engagement in forthcoming proposed rules. Throughout the past summer, the NLRB issued several rulings granting employers greater access control. For example, in June, the Board upended decades of precedent by holding that employers can prohibit union solicitation in public areas (such as, in the case at issue, a hospital cafeteria), provided the employer has a policy or practice prohibiting distribution or solicitation on its property, and does not only enforce the rule against union activities. This holding is a sharp reversal of the longstanding precedent that allowed union organizers access to any areas open to the general public, as long as they did not disrupt the employer’s operations.

In August, the NLRB continued down this path of increased employer access control, ruling that employers can refuse to allow off-duty contractors or licensees on private property, as long as the off-duty individuals do not regularly and exclusively work on the property and have other reasonable means to communicate with employees. Further strengthening an employer’s rights to limit property access by nonemployees, the NLRB determined that contractors—here, symphony orchestra musicians who performed at the location but were not employed by the center—are not entitled to the same rights enjoyed by employees. Given the current gig economy, in which many workers are classified as contractors, this ruling itself has wide-ranging implications that limit unions’ right of organization access.

The following month, in another reversal of precedent, the NLRB determined that employers could lawfully distinguish between types of nonemployee activities by barring some and allowing others. For example, an employer can prohibit nonemployees who protest, picket, boycott or, in this case, seek signatures from customers in support of a union protest, while allowing nonemployees on its property for charitable or civic purposes. 

Members of the NLRB have indicated that the Board plans to issue a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking—an early step federal agencies must take in issuing or amending governing rules—that will codify these decisions and clarify when and how employers can restrict union access to their property. This proposed rule is expected to remain in line with last summer’s case law and significantly expand employers’ rights to control who can enter their property and why. Employers, especially those with significant public spaces, or a substantial nonemployee population, should keep a sharp eye on these developments.

This blog is made available by Foley & Lardner LLP (“Foley” or “the Firm”) for informational purposes only. It is not meant to convey the Firm’s legal position on behalf of any client, nor is it intended to convey specific legal advice. Any opinions expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the views of Foley & Lardner LLP, its partners, or its clients. Accordingly, do not act upon this information without seeking counsel from a licensed attorney. This blog is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Communicating with Foley through this website by email, blog post, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship for any legal matter. Therefore, any communication or material you transmit to Foley through this blog, whether by email, blog post or any other manner, will not be treated as confidential or proprietary. The information on this blog is published “AS IS” and is not guaranteed to be complete, accurate, and or up-to-date. Foley makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, as to the operation or content of the site. Foley expressly disclaims all other guarantees, warranties, conditions and representations of any kind, either express or implied, whether arising under any statute, law, commercial use or otherwise, including implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Foley or any of its partners, officers, employees, agents or affiliates be liable, directly or indirectly, under any theory of law (contract, tort, negligence or otherwise), to you or anyone else, for any claims, losses or damages, direct, indirect special, incidental, punitive or consequential, resulting from or occasioned by the creation, use of or reliance on this site (including information and other content) or any third party websites or the information, resources or material accessed through any such websites. In some jurisdictions, the contents of this blog may be considered Attorney Advertising. If applicable, please note that prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Photographs are for dramatization purposes only and may include models. Likenesses do not necessarily imply current client, partnership or employee status.

Related Services