All in the Family – Why Controlled Group Rules Matter

09 December 2019 Labor & Employment Law Perspectives Blog
Authors: Casey D. Knapp

It’s the time of year when we all gather around with our families and loved ones.  It’s also a good time to remember that your company may have its own family.  Forgetting about that family can spell trouble.

The Internal Revenue Code (Code) and the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) each include their own definitions of a controlled group, or a group of trades or businesses under common control.  Generally speaking, companies are considered to be members of the same controlled group if there is at least 80% direct or indirect common ownership between or among different entities – the most common parent-subsidiary controlled group.

A simple example is a parent-subsidiary group in which the parent corporation owns 100% of its subsidiary or subsidiaries.

Figure 1

However, there are many more complicated rules that make this analysis less straightforward (just like family!).  For example:

  • There are brother-sister controlled groups – generally, a group of companies that have five or fewer owners who are individuals, trusts or estates that satisfy an 80% common ownership test and a 50% identical ownership test.

  • There are complicated attribution rules which, when applied, may make members of a group that at first glance do not appear to be related to in fact be members of the same group.

     

  • The option to purchase additional ownership rights is sometimes treated as actual ownership – for example, if Corporation A owns 70% of Corporation B (generally, not a controlled group), and has the option to purchase another 15% of Corporation B, then Corporation A could be treated as owning 85% of Corporation B, making them members of the same controlled group.

     

  • ERISA applies different rules that can lead to different results, especially in the private equity fund and withdrawal liability contexts.

     

  • The Code also includes complicated affiliated service group rules specifically designed to ensure that certain businesses in the service industry are considered to be members of the same group, even though they may not share any significant ownership.

So why does this matter?  The determination as to whether or not two companies are members of the same group touches all areas of executive compensation and employee benefits, and can have a material impact on whether or not you are operating your benefit plans and executive compensation arrangements in accordance with applicable rules.  For example:

  • Controlled group status determines whether a plan is a single employer or multiple employer plan – a consideration that is especially important in the self-insured welfare plan context.

     

  • Members of a controlled group are jointly and severally liable for certain obligations, including single employer pension liabilities, plan termination premiums, failure to notify the PBGC of reportable events, multiemployer termination and withdrawal liability.
  • Nondiscrimination and coverage tests for qualified retirement plans and self-insured welfare plans must be run on a controlled group basis.

     

  • Certain IRS limits, including the compensation limit under Code Section 401(a)(17) and Code Section 415, are applied on a controlled group basis.

     

  • Service credit for eligibility and vesting in a qualified retirement plan must consider service with all controlled group members.

     

  • COBRA obligations and penalties and the application of certain aspects of the Affordable Care Act depend on the number of employees on a controlled group basis.
  • The controlled group rules apply to deferred compensation arrangements under Code Section 409A for purposes of certain rules, including the determination of when a separation from service occurs (but using a 50%, rather than an 80% standard), plan aggregation rules, and determining specified employees of publicly traded companies.

So, no matter the time of year, don’t let your company forget about its family!

This blog is made available by Foley & Lardner LLP (“Foley” or “the Firm”) for informational purposes only. It is not meant to convey the Firm’s legal position on behalf of any client, nor is it intended to convey specific legal advice. Any opinions expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the views of Foley & Lardner LLP, its partners, or its clients. Accordingly, do not act upon this information without seeking counsel from a licensed attorney. This blog is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Communicating with Foley through this website by email, blog post, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship for any legal matter. Therefore, any communication or material you transmit to Foley through this blog, whether by email, blog post or any other manner, will not be treated as confidential or proprietary. The information on this blog is published “AS IS” and is not guaranteed to be complete, accurate, and or up-to-date. Foley makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, as to the operation or content of the site. Foley expressly disclaims all other guarantees, warranties, conditions and representations of any kind, either express or implied, whether arising under any statute, law, commercial use or otherwise, including implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Foley or any of its partners, officers, employees, agents or affiliates be liable, directly or indirectly, under any theory of law (contract, tort, negligence or otherwise), to you or anyone else, for any claims, losses or damages, direct, indirect special, incidental, punitive or consequential, resulting from or occasioned by the creation, use of or reliance on this site (including information and other content) or any third party websites or the information, resources or material accessed through any such websites. In some jurisdictions, the contents of this blog may be considered Attorney Advertising. If applicable, please note that prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Photographs are for dramatization purposes only and may include models. Likenesses do not necessarily imply current client, partnership or employee status.

Related Services