Florida Medical Marijuana Users May Soon Become Protected Class Under State Employment Laws

02 March 2020 Labor & Employment Law Perspectives Blog

In 2016, Florida joined the ranks of states that legalized medical marijuana after voters approved a constitutional amendment, which led to the enactment of implementing statutes. Since then, more than three hundred thousand Floridians have become medical marijuana users under the protection of those laws. However, because medical marijuana use remains illegal under federal law, employers with operations in Florida have not had to contend with providing accommodations to employees who happen to be medical marijuana users.

Like more than ten other states that have employer anti-retaliation provisions, Florida may soon be changing. Both chambers of the Florida Legislature are currently considering proposed bills aimed at extending certain protections to Florida employees who are legal medical marijuana users – those proposed bills are H.B. 595 and S.B. 962, which are collectively entitled the Medical Marijuana Employee Protection Act. Both bills, if passed, would extend to both private- and public-sector employees and employment applicants in Florida. If passed, one of the new rights these bills would provide to employees is the right to sue an employer if the employer takes an adverse employment action due to an employee’s status as a legal medical marijuana user.

The only exceptions included in these bills are employees in “safety-sensitive” positions such as teachers, firefighters, police, and school bus drivers. “Safety-sensitive” is defined in each bill as including tasks or job duties that the employer reasonably believes could affect the safety and/or health of the employees performing those tasks or job duties, or that of other persons, including, but not limited to, the following:

  • The handling, packaging, processing, storage, disposal, or transport of hazardous materials;


  • The operation of motorized vehicles, equipment, machinery, or power tools;


  • The repair, maintenance, or monitoring of any equipment, machinery, or manufacturing process, the malfunction or disruption of which could result in injury or property damage;


  • The performance of firefighting duties;


  • The operation, maintenance, or oversight of critical services and infrastructures, including, but not limited to, electric, gas, and water utilities or power generation or distribution;


  • The extraction, compression, processing, manufacturing, handling, packaging, storage, disposal, treatment, or transport of potentially volatile, flammable, combustible materials, elements, or chemicals, or any other highly regulated components;


  • The dispensing of pharmaceuticals;


  • The carrying of a firearm; and


  • The direct care of a patient or child.

If the Florida Medical Marijuana Patient Protection Act passes, medical marijuana use could become a new protected class of job applicant and employee under Florida law. As such, employers would be required to justify a failure to hire an applicant who is a medical marijuana user as well as to justify an adverse employment action against an employee who is a medical marijuana user. The new law would also require employers to demonstrate that the employee’s ability to perform his or her job duties is impaired by his or her lawful use of medical marijuana. If an employer fails to do so, the affected employee can seek and obtain injunctive relief (including job reinstatement), money damages, and an award of his or her attorney’s fees.

Employers with operations in states that have legalized any aspect of marijuana use, be it medical or recreational, should begin taking steps to deal with the surge in anti-retaliation protections. One such step is taking inventory of job descriptions to ensure that all descriptions accurately reflect the job duties performed by the employee(s) filling each position. Employers can further begin taking stock of which jobs within their organization fall under the definition of “safety-sensitive,” as such jobs would be exempt from the protections of the Medical Marijuana Patient Protection Act.

It is currently unclear whether the Florida Medical Marijuana Patient Protection Act will actually become law in Florida. However, prudent employers with operations in Florida should track the bills’ progress through the Florida Legislature. We will also endeavor to track these bills and circulate relevant updates.

This blog is made available by Foley & Lardner LLP (“Foley” or “the Firm”) for informational purposes only. It is not meant to convey the Firm’s legal position on behalf of any client, nor is it intended to convey specific legal advice. Any opinions expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the views of Foley & Lardner LLP, its partners, or its clients. Accordingly, do not act upon this information without seeking counsel from a licensed attorney. This blog is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Communicating with Foley through this website by email, blog post, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship for any legal matter. Therefore, any communication or material you transmit to Foley through this blog, whether by email, blog post or any other manner, will not be treated as confidential or proprietary. The information on this blog is published “AS IS” and is not guaranteed to be complete, accurate, and or up-to-date. Foley makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, as to the operation or content of the site. Foley expressly disclaims all other guarantees, warranties, conditions and representations of any kind, either express or implied, whether arising under any statute, law, commercial use or otherwise, including implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Foley or any of its partners, officers, employees, agents or affiliates be liable, directly or indirectly, under any theory of law (contract, tort, negligence or otherwise), to you or anyone else, for any claims, losses or damages, direct, indirect special, incidental, punitive or consequential, resulting from or occasioned by the creation, use of or reliance on this site (including information and other content) or any third party websites or the information, resources or material accessed through any such websites. In some jurisdictions, the contents of this blog may be considered Attorney Advertising. If applicable, please note that prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Photographs are for dramatization purposes only and may include models. Likenesses do not necessarily imply current client, partnership or employee status.

Related Services


What’s Next for Blockchain and Crypto?
01 December 2022
Innovative Technology Insights
Case Law Update: Disputes Relating to Supply Chain Disruptions Hit the Courts
01 December 2022
Manufacturing Industry Advisor
Foley Partner André Thiollier Moderates Global Venture Market Session at BayBrazil Conference
01 December 2022
Foley Ignite
Podcast Episode 96: Eric Williams, Associate
01 December 2022
Foley Career Perspectives
What You Should Know About Payor/Provider Convergence
25-26 January 2023
Los Angeles, CA
ATA EDGE2022 Policy Conference | American Telemedicine Association
7-9 December 2022
Washington, D.C.
CLE Weeks
5-16 December 2022
Milwaukee, WI
Foley Sponsors Ernst & Young Entrepreneur of the Year® Program
1 December 2021 - 30 November 2022
Michigan and Northwest Ohio Region