Performance-Based Compensation and the Coronavirus: 10 Key Questions

04 May 2020 Blog
Authors: Joshua A. Agen
Published To: Coronavirus Resource Center:Back to Business Labor & Employment Law Perspectives

Economic disruptions resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic have caused many employers to make changes to employee compensation, such as reducing or deferring base salaries, as part of cost-cutting measures.  

Bonus programs and other performance-based compensation arrangements are also being impacted, but in different ways.  One significant effect is that performance goals that once looked achievable may now be out of reach.  Companies are therefore having to decide whether to make changes to the performance goals to reflect the new economic reality.

The decision whether to modify performance goals will be specific to each company, but should be based on a systematic evaluation.  A checklist of 10 key questions to ask in deciding whether to modify performance-based compensation is below.


 Question  Factors to Consider
1. Which performance-based compensation programs are likely to be impacted? The programs most likely to be directly affected are:
  Annual bonus
  Long-term bonus
  Equity-based compensation
2. Are adjustments to performance goals permitted and, if so, what approvals or consents would be needed?   Whether adjustments are permitted will depend on the terms of the plan documents.  
  The level of approval required – Board, Compensation Committee or management – will be determined by the company’s governance structure and practices.   
  Participant consent may be required if the performance goals are part of a contract with the participant.
3. Would an adjustment to performance goals be consistent with the company’s goals for its incentive compensation programs?   What is the probability of achieving the original performance goals?
  What is the likely magnitude of the miss?
  How was performance trending prior to the economic shutdown?
  How does the company’s performance compare to peers who are also experiencing the economic downturn?
  What would be the retention and incentive impacts of not adjusting performance goals?
  Is there an existing precedent or policy that applies to this situation?
•  What would be the precedent-setting impact of adjusting or not adjusting?
4. What would be the accounting impact of an adjustment?   For cash-based awards, accruals may need to change.  
  For equity-based awards, a modification could trigger an accounting charge.
5. Would an adjustment affect the participants’ ability to defer compensation? •  If participants would normally be permitted to make an election to defer their incentive compensation until up to six months before the end of the performance period under the special Code Section 409A rule for performance-based compensation, an adjustment to the performance goals may disqualify the compensation for the special rule.  
  This could mean that there would be no opportunity to defer any incentive compensation that is earned.
6. When would be the right time to make an adjustment? •  Making the adjustment early could help preserve employee motivation and avoid the potentially demoralizing effects of unachievable performance goals.
•  However, making the adjustment before the full impact of the economic downturn is known could result in unanticipated outcomes or a need for multiple adjustments.
7. Are there alternatives to adjusting performance goals that may be preferable? •  Alternatives may include granting new or additional awards, making discretionary payments or repricing stock options.
 For Publicly Traded Companies Only: 
8. What disclosures would be required as a result of an adjustment? •  To the extent the adjustment results in payment to any of the company’s named executive officers that would not have been made absent the change, current disclosure on a Form 8-K may be required.  
  Even if disclosure on a Form 8-K is not required, the adjustments will need to be discussed in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section of the company’s Proxy Statement to the extent named executive officer compensation is affected.
9. How will proxy advisors and investors react?

•  Two of the leading proxy advisory firms, ISS and Glass Lewis, have issued guidance addressing how they will evaluate adjustments to performance-based compensation in the current environment. 

o  ISS provided no general relief from its general policies that are not supportive of mid-cycle changes to performance goals.  However, the firm suggested it would evaluate changes and the company’s rationale on a case-by-case basis and encouraged contemporaneous disclosure of the rationale for changes.
o  Glass Lewis emphasized the importance of proportionality and alignment between any changes to executive pay and the impact of the economic downturn on shareholder interests and employees.  

10. Would an adjustment impact the grandfathered status of any performance-based compensation?   The 2017 repeal of the exception for “performance-based compensation” from the $1 million deduction limit under Code Section 162(m) means that most performance-based compensation is fully subject to the limit and the former deadline of 90 days into the performance period for setting performance goals no longer applies.
  However, some companies may still have grandfathered compensation arrangements, and a change to performance goals under any such arrangements may jeopardize their grandfathered status.

As companies continue to evaluate how to respond to the economic consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic, their approach to performance-based compensation may have important and long-lasting effects on employee retention and motivation.  The foregoing checklist is only a summary.  Any changes to compensation programs should be undertaken thoughtfully only after comprehensive analysis of the legal, tax and accounting implications.

This blog is made available by Foley & Lardner LLP (“Foley” or “the Firm”) for informational purposes only. It is not meant to convey the Firm’s legal position on behalf of any client, nor is it intended to convey specific legal advice. Any opinions expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the views of Foley & Lardner LLP, its partners, or its clients. Accordingly, do not act upon this information without seeking counsel from a licensed attorney. This blog is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Communicating with Foley through this website by email, blog post, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship for any legal matter. Therefore, any communication or material you transmit to Foley through this blog, whether by email, blog post or any other manner, will not be treated as confidential or proprietary. The information on this blog is published “AS IS” and is not guaranteed to be complete, accurate, and or up-to-date. Foley makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, as to the operation or content of the site. Foley expressly disclaims all other guarantees, warranties, conditions and representations of any kind, either express or implied, whether arising under any statute, law, commercial use or otherwise, including implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Foley or any of its partners, officers, employees, agents or affiliates be liable, directly or indirectly, under any theory of law (contract, tort, negligence or otherwise), to you or anyone else, for any claims, losses or damages, direct, indirect special, incidental, punitive or consequential, resulting from or occasioned by the creation, use of or reliance on this site (including information and other content) or any third party websites or the information, resources or material accessed through any such websites. In some jurisdictions, the contents of this blog may be considered Attorney Advertising. If applicable, please note that prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Photographs are for dramatization purposes only and may include models. Likenesses do not necessarily imply current client, partnership or employee status.

Related Services

Insights