Recognition and Enforcement in Mexico of Foreign Reorganization Proceedings (Chapter 11)

28 May 2020 Coronavirus Resource Center:Back to Business Blog
Author(s): Daniel Aranda Roberto Arena Reyes Retana Miguel Angel Hernandez Romo Valencia Charles E. Meacham Holland N. O'Neil

COVID-19 has had a dramatic impact on the world economy with the virus affecting jobs and companies around the world in many ways, with imminent cash-flow shortfalls soon to occur throughout many sectors of the global economy.  This client alert analyzes how to utilize courts in Mexico to achieve recognition and enforcement of Chapter 11 proceedings (or other similar reorganization processes being conducted around the world) when the petitioner has assets or subsidiaries in Mexico. Undertaking certain proceedings in Mexico may allow financially-distressed companies to effectively enforce in Mexico the effects of the automatic stay pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 362 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code and other types of stay orders or injunctions obtained outside of Mexico in order to impede foreign or Mexican creditors from undertaking collection actions against assets and subsidiaries in Mexico to the detriment of the estate of the reorganization petitioner.  Many jurisdictions dictate that such reorganization processes cover all of the assets of the petitioner, wherever located; however, in many countries such as Mexico, in order to insure that assets in Mexico are validly included and protected, certain proceedings must first be undertaken before a Mexican court.  This is not unlike the Chapter 15 proceedings under the U.S. Bankruptcy Code to protect assets in the U.S. where owned by an entity undergoing a foreign restructuring proceeding.  

Article 279 of the Mexican Reorganizations Law contemplates the recognition in Mexico of a foreign chapter 11 or reorganization proceeding.  However, in order for such recognition to occur in Mexico, specific relief must be requested (the “Recognition Writ”) by the individual, court or party that has been appointed to manage the reorganization or to act on behalf of the reorganization proceeding or process (e.g., a trustee) (the “Appointed Representative”). 

In order to request such recognition, the Appointed Representative must submit the following documents to the Mexican court:

  • An authenticated resolution or certificate issued by the foreign bankruptcy court evidencing the existence of such foreign proceeding as well as the appointment of the Appointed Representative; 

  • In the absence of the aforementioned resolution or certificate, any other document that proves the existence of such foreign proceeding and the designation of the Appointed Representative; 

  • A declaration listing all of the foreign proceedings involving the petitioner of which the Appointed Representative has knowledge; and

  • A translation into Spanish of all of the documents that are included with the petition prepared by a certified translator authorized by the Mexican courts.

The Mexican Reorganizations Law allows for two different types of procedures in Mexico depending on whether or not the petitioner has a branch, subsidiary or a controlling interest in a Mexican company (collectively, the “Establishment”).

Recognition Procedure for Petitioners With an Establishment in Mexico

Upon the filing of the Recognition Writ, the Mexican court is required to analyze the admissibility of the writ, including compliance with certain formalities, to request the recognition and enforcement in Mexico of the foreign reorganization proceedings.  This includes a review of the qualifications and legitimacy of the Appointed Representative, as well as the authenticity of the documents provided and the circumstances surrounding any request for injunctive or temporary relief measures.

Once the Recognition Writ is duly-admitted, the Mexican court will undertake the following analysis of the Recognition Writ:

  • Order service of process on the Establishment requiring the Establishment to file an answer responding to the evidence and allegations contained in the Recognition Writ.  In addition, the Establishment is required to prepare a list naming the creditors of the Establishment, as well as any evidence to support the merits of the Establishment’s answer.

  • Request the assistance of the Mexican Federal Institute of Reorganization Specialists in order to appoint an examiner (the “Examiner”) who will attest, through the issuance of an Examiner’s Report, to the current financial condition of the Establishment considering the terms of the Recognition Writ and the answer provided by the Establishment. The designation of the Examiner and any assistants must be agreed to, and confirmed, by the Mexican court and the parties of interest in order to avoid any conflicts of interest.

  • In order to provide to the Mexican court the complete context of the case, the Appointed Representative is entitled to prepare a response to the allegations of the Establishment set forth in its answer to the Recognition Writ.

  • In the event of a request for injunctive or temporary relief by the Appointed Representative, the Court will analyze their admissibility during this procedural stage of the proceedings.

Once the Mexican court has completed the preceding review, the parties proceed to the review of the Examiner’s Report.  During this stage of the process, the Examiner visits the facilities of the Establishment and undertakes a review of the financial documents and information about the Establishment in order to prepare and issue the Examiner’s Report.

After the issuance of the Examiner’s Report, the Mexican court will require the parties to prepare and present their final arguments based upon which the Mexican court will issue a ruling whether or not to recognize and enforce the foreign reorganization process on the Establishment.  

Recognition Procedure for Petitioners That Do Not Have an Establishment in Mexico

In the event that the petitioner does not have an Establishment but does have assets in Mexico, the Appointed Representative that requests recognition of the foreign proceeding is required to designate an address so that a summons can be issued by the Mexican court.  In this type of ancillary proceeding, the only parties that appear before the Mexican court are the Appointed Representative and the petitioner.

In those situations where the petitioner does not have an Establishment in Mexico, there will therefore be no declaration or ruling from the Mexican court recognizing and enforcing the foreign Chapter 11 proceeding, nor a visit from an Examiner, due to the fact that the petitioner will not be able to demonstrate that it has an Establishment in Mexico.  Therefore, in principle, any creditors that wish to assert claims against these assets in Mexico will have to assert those claims in the foreign Chapter 11 proceeding.

This blog is made available by Foley & Lardner LLP (“Foley” or “the Firm”) for informational purposes only. It is not meant to convey the Firm’s legal position on behalf of any client, nor is it intended to convey specific legal advice. Any opinions expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the views of Foley & Lardner LLP, its partners, or its clients. Accordingly, do not act upon this information without seeking counsel from a licensed attorney. This blog is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Communicating with Foley through this website by email, blog post, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship for any legal matter. Therefore, any communication or material you transmit to Foley through this blog, whether by email, blog post or any other manner, will not be treated as confidential or proprietary. The information on this blog is published “AS IS” and is not guaranteed to be complete, accurate, and or up-to-date. Foley makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, as to the operation or content of the site. Foley expressly disclaims all other guarantees, warranties, conditions and representations of any kind, either express or implied, whether arising under any statute, law, commercial use or otherwise, including implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Foley or any of its partners, officers, employees, agents or affiliates be liable, directly or indirectly, under any theory of law (contract, tort, negligence or otherwise), to you or anyone else, for any claims, losses or damages, direct, indirect special, incidental, punitive or consequential, resulting from or occasioned by the creation, use of or reliance on this site (including information and other content) or any third party websites or the information, resources or material accessed through any such websites. In some jurisdictions, the contents of this blog may be considered Attorney Advertising. If applicable, please note that prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Photographs are for dramatization purposes only and may include models. Likenesses do not necessarily imply current client, partnership or employee status.

Related Services