Voting in the Age of COVID-19

26 October 2020 Blog
Author(s): Jonathan Michael Thomas
Published To: Coronavirus Resource Center:Back to Business Labor & Employment Law Perspectives

Election Day is fast approaching, with November 3, 2020, being the last day to vote in the 2020 presidential election.  As employees go to the polls, employers should review the voting leave laws in their applicable state.  In 2020, 30 states have some form of requirement that obligates employers to give employees time off to vote.  These laws vary greatly across the country.  For example, some states, like California, require employers to pay for up to two hours of time off to every employee to vote. Other states, like Arkansas, simply require employers to provide an unspecified amount of time off, which is unpaid.

This year, employers are also wrestling with the implications of COVID-19.  As we have previously reported, many employers have implemented remote working for their employees, and there are a number of employment law considerations applicable to a remote workforce. Voting laws are another area with specific implications for teleworking employees.  Employers should note that state voting laws generally do not make exceptions for employees who work from home versus employees who work at their employer’s worksite. Accordingly, employers should continue to follow their time off policies for voting—assuming, of course, such policies are consistent with state law—and provide time off or, if required, paid time off, regardless of whether their employee is working from home or working at the employer’s worksite.

In addition to providing time off to vote, employers should keep in mind these five tips to avoid running afoul of voting leave laws:

1. Check your state’s specific leave laws. As mentioned above, state laws vary greatly as to the amount of leave an employer is required to provide and whether that time off must be paid or not.  Since the last presidential election, several states, including New York, Virginia, the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico, have updated their voting leave laws. A number of states have also implemented emergency measures to accommodate COVID-19 concerns, such as increasing capacity for mail-in voting. Employers should review their specific state requirements. If employers have employees located in multiple states, they should make sure that their leave policies accommodate every state in which their employees work.

2. Don’t tell your employees who to vote for. Some jurisdictions have specific rules that prohibit employers from influencing their employees’ votes. Even if your state does not prohibit employers from influencing employee votes, discretion is the better part of valor when it comes to politics at the office. Employers generally are better served if they do not hold captive meetings to discuss political issues, threaten employees over which political candidates or causes they support, or mandate attendance of employees at political rallies.

3. Don’t punish employees for not voting. While the coveted “I voted” sticker is a badge of honor many employees proudly wear, employers should not chastise employees who choose not to vote. First, only U.S. citizens are permitted to vote in general elections. Further, some religions prohibit voting, as it would require the person to judge a particular candidate.  Criticizing an employee who does not vote may inadvertently mean you are criticizing an employee who is part of a protected class. The bottom line is - permit employees time off to vote, but do not criticize those who choose not to vote.

4. Recognize that this year will be unique. With COVID-19, voting this year will be markedly different than in years past.  States that permit early voting have reported long lines at polling places and longer than average wait times due to social distancing, disinfecting, and other measures to keep voters and pollsters safe during while voting.  Employers should be understanding if employees take slightly longer to vote this year given the necessary precautions polling places have to take.

5. Not allowing time off for voting could lead to public relations issues in addition to legal issues. Over the past few years, voting has become a hot-button issue for many companies.  Nonpartisan groups like and Time to Vote have raised awareness of and engaged in advocacy regarding voting leave.  As a result, more than 700 companies nationwide have made pledges to provide employees adequate time to vote. Some are going further than state laws require, by making Election Day a paid holiday, providing employees with early voting information, mail-in ballots, and voting locations, and giving employees paid or unpaid time off to act as polling volunteers.  As these practices become more and more common, employers should recognize that not providing employees with time off could lead to a phone call with your PR representatives (in addition to your lawyer).

Companies in all sectors of the economy continue to be impacted by COVID-19. Foley is here to help our clients effectively address the short- and long-term impacts on their business interests, operations, and objectives. Foley provides insights and strategies across multiple industries and disciplines to deliver timely perspectives on the wide range of legal and business challenges that companies face conducting business while dealing with the impact of the coronavirus. Click here to stay up to date and ahead of the curve with our key publications addressing today’s challenges and tomorrow’s opportunities.

This blog is made available by Foley & Lardner LLP (“Foley” or “the Firm”) for informational purposes only. It is not meant to convey the Firm’s legal position on behalf of any client, nor is it intended to convey specific legal advice. Any opinions expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the views of Foley & Lardner LLP, its partners, or its clients. Accordingly, do not act upon this information without seeking counsel from a licensed attorney. This blog is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Communicating with Foley through this website by email, blog post, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship for any legal matter. Therefore, any communication or material you transmit to Foley through this blog, whether by email, blog post or any other manner, will not be treated as confidential or proprietary. The information on this blog is published “AS IS” and is not guaranteed to be complete, accurate, and or up-to-date. Foley makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, as to the operation or content of the site. Foley expressly disclaims all other guarantees, warranties, conditions and representations of any kind, either express or implied, whether arising under any statute, law, commercial use or otherwise, including implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Foley or any of its partners, officers, employees, agents or affiliates be liable, directly or indirectly, under any theory of law (contract, tort, negligence or otherwise), to you or anyone else, for any claims, losses or damages, direct, indirect special, incidental, punitive or consequential, resulting from or occasioned by the creation, use of or reliance on this site (including information and other content) or any third party websites or the information, resources or material accessed through any such websites. In some jurisdictions, the contents of this blog may be considered Attorney Advertising. If applicable, please note that prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Photographs are for dramatization purposes only and may include models. Likenesses do not necessarily imply current client, partnership or employee status.

Related Services