Credentialing by Proxy: Joint Commission’s Improved Telemedicine Accreditation Rules

15 March 2021 Health Care Law Today Blog
Authors: Alan H. Einhorn Nathaniel M. Lacktman

The Joint Commission recently announced it has changed its accreditation rules to enable more hospitals and telemedicine companies to use the streamlined “credentialing by proxy” process. Under the change, the distant site telemedicine entity must be accredited with The Joint Commission or enrolled in the Medicare program. Previously, the rules required both the originating site hospital and the distant site entity to be accredited with The Joint Commission. That requirement of dual-accreditation was exclusively created by The Joint Commission, and was not mandated by the CMS Medicare regulations.

This is a welcome change that will enable more hospitals and more distant site telemedicine entities to avail themselves of the more efficient and less expensive proxy credentialing process in their hospital B2B telemedicine service agreements. Both rural and originating site hospitals, as well as telemedicine companies offering professional services to those hospitals, will benefit from this change.

The rule change is found in the Hospital Medical Staff Standards.  It is effective July 2, 2021 and will be included in The Joint Commission’s  Comprehensive Accreditation Manual for Critical Access Hospitals (CAMCAH) and Comprehensive Accreditation Manual for Hospitals (CAMH).

What is Credentialing by Proxy?

The Medicare Conditions of Participation require hospitals and certain other accredited health care facilities and providers to have a credentialing and privileging process for physicians and practitioners providing services to their patients. This includes practitioners who provide services via telemedicine. Recognizing the inherent differences between in-person care and virtual care (including, for smaller and rural hospitals, the potential complexities associated with credentialing multiple specialist and sub-specialist applicants), the Conditions of Participation allow a process for streamlined credentialing of telemedicine-based practitioners, allowing hospitals to more efficiently harness the benefits of telemedicine and comply with the Conditions of Participation without incurring the full administrative burden associated with the traditional credentialing process.

This streamlined process is commonly referred to as “credentialing by proxy.” It permits the hospital receiving the telemedicine services (known as the “Originating Site” hospital) to rely on the privileging and credentialing decisions made by the hospital or a non-hospital entity providing the telemedicine services (known as the “Distant Site” hospital or “Distant Site Telemedicine Entity,” respectively), provided certain requirements are met.

Credentialing by proxy is one of many regulatory features that, while complex, can be a great opportunity for hospitals and telemedicine companies to deliver their services faster and at lower administrative cost. Telemedicine companies and hospitals that understand and implement these processes will be better positioned in the marketplace to more nimbly deliver services to patients across locations and geographies.

Want to Learn More?

For more information on telemedicine, telehealth, and virtual care innovations, including the team, publications, and other materials, visit Foley’s Telemedicine Practice.

This blog is made available by Foley & Lardner LLP (“Foley” or “the Firm”) for informational purposes only. It is not meant to convey the Firm’s legal position on behalf of any client, nor is it intended to convey specific legal advice. Any opinions expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the views of Foley & Lardner LLP, its partners, or its clients. Accordingly, do not act upon this information without seeking counsel from a licensed attorney. This blog is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Communicating with Foley through this website by email, blog post, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship for any legal matter. Therefore, any communication or material you transmit to Foley through this blog, whether by email, blog post or any other manner, will not be treated as confidential or proprietary. The information on this blog is published “AS IS” and is not guaranteed to be complete, accurate, and or up-to-date. Foley makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, as to the operation or content of the site. Foley expressly disclaims all other guarantees, warranties, conditions and representations of any kind, either express or implied, whether arising under any statute, law, commercial use or otherwise, including implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Foley or any of its partners, officers, employees, agents or affiliates be liable, directly or indirectly, under any theory of law (contract, tort, negligence or otherwise), to you or anyone else, for any claims, losses or damages, direct, indirect special, incidental, punitive or consequential, resulting from or occasioned by the creation, use of or reliance on this site (including information and other content) or any third party websites or the information, resources or material accessed through any such websites. In some jurisdictions, the contents of this blog may be considered Attorney Advertising. If applicable, please note that prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Photographs are for dramatization purposes only and may include models. Likenesses do not necessarily imply current client, partnership or employee status.