Now that the 55% Threshold has been Met – What This Really Means for Michigan Businesses

13 May 2021 Blog
Authors: Jeffrey S. Kopp
Published To: Coronavirus Resource Center:Back to Business Labor & Employment Law Perspectives

Michigan has hit the 55% target of vaccinated individuals receiving at least a single vaccination dose, and this means that office work may resume effective Monday, May 24, 2021.

Practically, what does this mean for employers?

1.  Employees May Still be Reluctant to Return to Work

As we have seen with businesses that have continued to operate in person during the pandemic, employees may have medical conditions or religious reasons for not receiving a vaccine.  So some employees may not be vaccinated.  These individuals may be fearful of contracting COVID-19 in the workplace, and may request accommodations under the Americans with Disabilities Act or Title VII.  Employers will have to engage in the interactive process with these employees to determine whether there are reasonable accommodations that must be provided to the employee in order to comply with the ADA.  In addition, some employees have minor children whose schools might still be affected by COVID-19, and they may need time off to deal with these contingencies.  No doubt, employers will have to be flexible in handling these accommodations, leave and attendance issues.

2.  Employers Will Still Have to Fear MIOSHA

 Most employers have gone above and beyond to make their workplaces reasonably safe, implementing rigid controls to prevent the spread of the virus and to protect their workforces.  However, MIOSHA is still actively citing employers for violations of its October 14, 2020 Emergency Rules, which require, among other things, employee surveillance, training, reporting and recordkeeping.  While MIOSHA claims that it is reviewing the Emergency Rules, employers are currently subject to considerable fines for violating the existing Emergency Rules requirements. Undoubtedly, employers will have to continue to enforce mask requirements and social distancing and will be cited if they do not. 

3.  Employers Likely Will Adopt a Phased-in Approach

Despite the relaxation of a work from home requirement, the reality is that many employers will not require their entire workforce to report to work on May 24.  While some employers may have an interest in returning their entire workforce to on-site work, many employers likely will phase in the return to work, allowing some employees to come in sooner.  Those with more pressing in-person demands may be first back to work; while others who are equally productive in a remote setting may opt for the status quo.  This may not be a bad option for employers to limit risk during this impending change.

In any event, Michigan employers should be ready for a rapidly changing employment landscape.  For additional information about continuing COVID-19 workforce requirements, please contact your Foley & Lardner Labor & Employment attorney or the author listed below. 

COVID-19 continues to impact companies in all sectors of the economy.  Foley is here to help our clients effectively address the short-term and long-term impacts on their business interests, operations, and objectives. Foley provides insights and strategies across multiple industries and disciplines to provide timely perspective on the wide range of legal and business challenges that companies face conducting business while dealing with the impact of the coronavirus. Click here to stay up to date and ahead of the curve with our key publications addressing today’s challenges and tomorrow’s opportunities. To receive this content directly in your inbox, click here and submit the form. 

This blog is made available by Foley & Lardner LLP (“Foley” or “the Firm”) for informational purposes only. It is not meant to convey the Firm’s legal position on behalf of any client, nor is it intended to convey specific legal advice. Any opinions expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the views of Foley & Lardner LLP, its partners, or its clients. Accordingly, do not act upon this information without seeking counsel from a licensed attorney. This blog is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Communicating with Foley through this website by email, blog post, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship for any legal matter. Therefore, any communication or material you transmit to Foley through this blog, whether by email, blog post or any other manner, will not be treated as confidential or proprietary. The information on this blog is published “AS IS” and is not guaranteed to be complete, accurate, and or up-to-date. Foley makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, as to the operation or content of the site. Foley expressly disclaims all other guarantees, warranties, conditions and representations of any kind, either express or implied, whether arising under any statute, law, commercial use or otherwise, including implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Foley or any of its partners, officers, employees, agents or affiliates be liable, directly or indirectly, under any theory of law (contract, tort, negligence or otherwise), to you or anyone else, for any claims, losses or damages, direct, indirect special, incidental, punitive or consequential, resulting from or occasioned by the creation, use of or reliance on this site (including information and other content) or any third party websites or the information, resources or material accessed through any such websites. In some jurisdictions, the contents of this blog may be considered Attorney Advertising. If applicable, please note that prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Photographs are for dramatization purposes only and may include models. Likenesses do not necessarily imply current client, partnership or employee status.

Related Services