Clinical Trials: Does FDA’s Notice to Acceleron Signal a New Era of Enforcement for Results Reporting?

07 May 2021 Health Care Law Today Blog
Authors: Devaki Patel Kyle Y. Faget

On April 27, 2021, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) sent a notice of noncompliance to Acceleron Pharma (Acceleron), accusing the company of failing to post clinical trial summary results on its cancer combination drug therapy, dalantercept and axitinib, on ClinicalTrials.gov, as required by federal law.

The study in question involved a Phase 2 randomized, double-blind clinical trial comparing the combination of dalantercept and axitinib to placebo plus Axitinib in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma. After the trial failed to reach its primary endpoint, Acceleron discontinued the development of dalantercept in 2017.

A responsible party, typically a clinical trial sponsor or sponsor investigator, of an applicable clinical trial (any clinical trial (other than a device feasibility trial or a phase I drug trial) to collect data to support an FDA premarket submission) is required to submit to ClinicalTrials.gov certain information about the results of such a clinical trial; this information generally must be submitted no later than one year after the primary completion date of the applicable clinical trial unless an exception applies. See section 402(j)(3)(E) of the Public Health Service Act (PHS Act) (42 U.S.C. § 282(j)(3)(E)). The responsible party can submit a certification of delay, a request for an extension of good cause, or a request for a waiver of the requirements for submission of results information. See 42 C.F.R. § 11.44, and section 402(j)(3)(H) of the PHS Act (42 U.S.C. § 282(j)(3)(H)). The responsible party is also required to register applicable clinical trials on ClinicalTrials.gov within 21 days after the first human subject is enrolled in the applicable clinical trial.

In the letter sent in April, FDA stated it acted after warning Acceleron in July 2020 that the company had failed to properly report the study results of the completed clinical trial. In the same April letter, FDA threatened Acceleron with a $10,000 fine or criminal prosecution if the company did not post these results on ClinicalTrials.gov within 30 days. Furthermore, FDA stated that if Acceleron fails to submit the required information within the 30-day period, it will seek additional monetary penalties and consider criminal prosecution. After the 30-day window, financial penalties for failure to comply with FDA’s request can be up to $10,000 for each day of the violation until the violation is corrected. See section 303(f)(3)(B) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FD&C Act, 21 U.S.C. § 301-392). As reported by trade press, Acceleron stated that lack of compliance was the result of a clerical oversight and that the results will be posted within the 30-day remediation period set by FDA.

FDA’s action is thought to be the first notice of noncompliance sent to a pharmaceutical company that threatens prosecution and threatens imposing fines for not posting a summary of clinical trial results on ClinicalTrials.gov. In August 2020, FDA described its approach regarding how it identifies responsible parties that had failed to submit required registration and or summary results to ClinicalTrials.gov. Until now, FDA has only sent notices of noncompliance to encourage voluntary compliance with the information submission requirements, which have served primarily as verbal warnings.

According to a recent statement by FDA, the legal requirements applicable to Clinicaltrials.gov reporting are intended to provide greater transparency about the results of completed clinical trials to allow for the scientific community to build on submitted information. FDA stated that it “takes its role in enforcing the ClinicalTrials.gov registration and results information submission requirements extremely seriously and we will continue to encourage voluntary compliance with these requirements.” The Agency further stated it will take appropriate actions when necessary to ensure that required information is available on ClinicalTrials.gov as required by the law. This recent turn of events may signal a new wave of enforcement actions against companies who fail to comply with these statutory and regulatory requirements related to ClinicalTrials.gov.

Foley is here to help you address the short- and long-term impacts in the wake of regulatory changes. We have the resources to help you navigate these and other important legal considerations related to business operations and industry-specific issues. Please reach out to the authors, your Foley relationship partner, or to our Health Care Practice Group with any questions.

 

This blog is made available by Foley & Lardner LLP (“Foley” or “the Firm”) for informational purposes only. It is not meant to convey the Firm’s legal position on behalf of any client, nor is it intended to convey specific legal advice. Any opinions expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the views of Foley & Lardner LLP, its partners, or its clients. Accordingly, do not act upon this information without seeking counsel from a licensed attorney. This blog is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Communicating with Foley through this website by email, blog post, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship for any legal matter. Therefore, any communication or material you transmit to Foley through this blog, whether by email, blog post or any other manner, will not be treated as confidential or proprietary. The information on this blog is published “AS IS” and is not guaranteed to be complete, accurate, and or up-to-date. Foley makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, as to the operation or content of the site. Foley expressly disclaims all other guarantees, warranties, conditions and representations of any kind, either express or implied, whether arising under any statute, law, commercial use or otherwise, including implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Foley or any of its partners, officers, employees, agents or affiliates be liable, directly or indirectly, under any theory of law (contract, tort, negligence or otherwise), to you or anyone else, for any claims, losses or damages, direct, indirect special, incidental, punitive or consequential, resulting from or occasioned by the creation, use of or reliance on this site (including information and other content) or any third party websites or the information, resources or material accessed through any such websites. In some jurisdictions, the contents of this blog may be considered Attorney Advertising. If applicable, please note that prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Photographs are for dramatization purposes only and may include models. Likenesses do not necessarily imply current client, partnership or employee status.

Related Services