Employers Beware: You May Be Required to Provide Paid Military Leave

16 August 2021 Labor & Employment Law Perspectives Blog
Authors: Kamran Mirrafati

The Uniformed Services Employee and Reemployment Rights Act (USERRA) provides employees with a variety of leave entitlements for absences related to military service.  The law does not explicitly require paying employees out on military leave. However, earlier this year, we wrote that employers (particularly those in Illinois, Indiana and Wisconsin) should revisit their military leave policies because the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit had ruled that failure to provide paid military leave, while simultaneously offering paid time off for other absences (such as for jury duty or sick leave), might in fact violate USERRA.

More recently, another decision out of the Third U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals — which covers Delaware, New Jersey and Pennsylvania — reached a similar conclusion.  The Court stated that USERRA “does not allow employers to treat service members differently by paying employees for some kinds of leave while exempting military service.” 

Now that at least two decisions have been issued, similar rulings and interpretations are likely to be issued in other jurisdictions.  Therefore, employers throughout the country should revisit their military leave policies in order to ensure compliance.

On a positive note, however, also as we previously wrote, employers are only required to pay for stretches of military leave that are “comparable” to other types of paid leaves provided by the employer.  This comparability analysis depends on the facts and should focus on factors such as the duration of the leave (which is often the most significant factor), the purpose of the leave, and the ability of the employee to choose when to take the leave.

Foley is here to help employers with questions regarding these factors and how best to revise military leave policies for compliance.

This blog is made available by Foley & Lardner LLP (“Foley” or “the Firm”) for informational purposes only. It is not meant to convey the Firm’s legal position on behalf of any client, nor is it intended to convey specific legal advice. Any opinions expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the views of Foley & Lardner LLP, its partners, or its clients. Accordingly, do not act upon this information without seeking counsel from a licensed attorney. This blog is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Communicating with Foley through this website by email, blog post, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship for any legal matter. Therefore, any communication or material you transmit to Foley through this blog, whether by email, blog post or any other manner, will not be treated as confidential or proprietary. The information on this blog is published “AS IS” and is not guaranteed to be complete, accurate, and or up-to-date. Foley makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, as to the operation or content of the site. Foley expressly disclaims all other guarantees, warranties, conditions and representations of any kind, either express or implied, whether arising under any statute, law, commercial use or otherwise, including implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Foley or any of its partners, officers, employees, agents or affiliates be liable, directly or indirectly, under any theory of law (contract, tort, negligence or otherwise), to you or anyone else, for any claims, losses or damages, direct, indirect special, incidental, punitive or consequential, resulting from or occasioned by the creation, use of or reliance on this site (including information and other content) or any third party websites or the information, resources or material accessed through any such websites. In some jurisdictions, the contents of this blog may be considered Attorney Advertising. If applicable, please note that prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Photographs are for dramatization purposes only and may include models. Likenesses do not necessarily imply current client, partnership or employee status.

Related Services