Union Lacks Standing to Bring COVID Lawsuit on Behalf of its Members

07 September 2021 Blog
Author(s): Felicia S. O'Connor
Published To: Labor & Employment Law Perspectives Coronavirus Resource Center:Back to Business

As the pandemic continues, so too does the threat to employers of employment litigation related to COVID-19. Employers face the prospect of claims related to leave, disability accommodation, remote working, vaccine mandates, and more. One significant area of potential litigation involves claims brought by employees who may contract COVID-19 in the workplace.

To make matters even more complicated, some regions have moved away from state and local mandates regarding COVID-19 safety protocols in the workplace, leaving employers responsible to determine and enforce the appropriate level of safety protocols.

In a time of increasing uncertainty regarding what COVID-19 safety measures must or should be implemented, unionized employers recently received one bit of good news, when a federal court in New York issued an opinion in a case brought by the president of the U.S. Security Officers Union. The union, representing over two thousand court security officers, alleged that their employer (the federal government) did not adequately protect the employees from COVID-19. The complaint contended that the employer failed to properly clean the officers’ work areas and courthouses, failed to provide adequate personal protective equipment (PPE), and failed to train on proper use of the PPE, creating an alleged risk to the employees. The union further alleged that its members contracted COVID-19 in the workplace as a result of the lack of proper protocols by the employer and that some even died.

The court dismissed the union’s claims without even reaching the merits because it determined that the union did not have standing to bring the claim as an organization. In other words, the court concluded that while the union’s individual members may have been injured, the union itself must show that it was injured as an organization by the complained-of actions. Because the union itself did not have an injury, it could not bring the claim.

While technically only applicable to the portions of New York covered by the court, the decision that such suits can only be brought by those persons or organizations that have suffered an actual injury will likely have a chilling effect for any other union that was considering asserting similar allegations. The benefit to employers is that while they may face claims by individual employees, unless the union can articulate an injury to itself as an organization, employers will not face a claim by the union that aggregates the possible employees’ claims.

This blog is made available by Foley & Lardner LLP (“Foley” or “the Firm”) for informational purposes only. It is not meant to convey the Firm’s legal position on behalf of any client, nor is it intended to convey specific legal advice. Any opinions expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the views of Foley & Lardner LLP, its partners, or its clients. Accordingly, do not act upon this information without seeking counsel from a licensed attorney. This blog is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Communicating with Foley through this website by email, blog post, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship for any legal matter. Therefore, any communication or material you transmit to Foley through this blog, whether by email, blog post or any other manner, will not be treated as confidential or proprietary. The information on this blog is published “AS IS” and is not guaranteed to be complete, accurate, and or up-to-date. Foley makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, as to the operation or content of the site. Foley expressly disclaims all other guarantees, warranties, conditions and representations of any kind, either express or implied, whether arising under any statute, law, commercial use or otherwise, including implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Foley or any of its partners, officers, employees, agents or affiliates be liable, directly or indirectly, under any theory of law (contract, tort, negligence or otherwise), to you or anyone else, for any claims, losses or damages, direct, indirect special, incidental, punitive or consequential, resulting from or occasioned by the creation, use of or reliance on this site (including information and other content) or any third party websites or the information, resources or material accessed through any such websites. In some jurisdictions, the contents of this blog may be considered Attorney Advertising. If applicable, please note that prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Photographs are for dramatization purposes only and may include models. Likenesses do not necessarily imply current client, partnership or employee status.


Related Services