Reductions-in-Force are Never Pleasant, but There’s a Right Way and (Many) Wrong Ways

14 November 2022 Labor & Employment Law Perspectives Blog
Author(s): Katelynn M. Williams

Here in Wisconsin, we say – “Don’t like the weather? Wait five minutes” – to capture our ever-changing outdoors. (Case in point: as I write this article, today’s high temperature is 72 degrees; tomorrow’s is 36.) The phrase comes to mind when processing recent whiplash news that US employers added a better-than-expected 261,000 jobs in October, while  the tech sector reportedly cut more jobs already in November than any other month this year, impacting 21,000 employees across 46 companies.

Wait – is the economy hot or cold?

We have you covered either way. Last week we shared tips on keeping employees in an increasingly mobile workforce. But for those employers on the cooling side and considering a reduction-in-force (RIF), here are some best practices to keep in mind: 

  1. Weigh your options. It is easier for an employer to defend the decision to conduct a RIF if it has explored other less drastic measures such as hiring freezes, furloughs, or temporary reductions in pay or hours. (Of course, such alternatives come with their own legal considerations.)
  2. Plan, plan, plan. RIFs come with stress (for both employer and employees) and legal risks. Careful planning is key to minimizing both. For example, for larger layoffs, build in time to run statistical analyses with counsel (under attorney-client privilege) to assess whether the selection criteria inadvertently have disparate impact on employees in protected classes. Know whether the RIF would affect employees on medical or military leave or employees who engaged in protected activity, and ensure such employees would have been included in the RIF regardless of their protected leave or activity. Consider forming an independent committee to review selection decisions for consistency with the RIF’s stated goals.
  3. Document, document, document. Be sure to document the underlying business decisions and justifications at each step of the RIF process, particularly:
    1. The options explored other than a RIF (if any), and the reason(s) for conducting the RIF.
    2. The objective, non-discriminatory selection criteria (such as seniority, special skillsets, redundant jobs, eliminated positions, etc.) that led to your decisions to include individual employees in the RIF. And, if using subjective selection criteria, the legitimate reasons for distinguishing between employees (such as rationale from department-level managers who are familiar with the employees’ performance).
    3. With these criteria in mind, thoroughly document the reason(s) for selecting each employee included in the RIF.
  4. Consider severance packages. Severance packages can help minimize legal risks associated with RIFs by getting a release of claims from departing employees. Any severance agreements should be reviewed for compliance with various applicable laws, including the Older Worker Benefit Protection Act, which mandates, among other things, that employees age 40+ included in a RIF receive certain information, an extended time to review the agreement (45 days in a RIF), and one week to “revoke” it even after execution.
  5. Message honestly and consistently. As noted, RIFs are stressful on both sides. Employers should not lose sight of the fact that their employees’ livelihoods may be at stake. If possible, meet individually with affected employees (and a witness). In communicating the RIF, be empathetic, respectful, honest, and grateful for the departing employees’ services. If supervisors are likely to be involved in messaging, ensure they understand the rationale for the RIF and are trained to effectively communicate with employees.
  6. Don’t forget about your retained employees. Employees not included in the RIF may be feeling apprehensive or angry. Consider meeting with retained employees to answer questions, rebuild trust, and improve morale.
  7. And all the rest. The above is by no means a comprehensive overview of the legal pitfalls that a RIF can present. Depending on the situation, an employer’s planned RIF may trigger advance notice and other requirements under the federal Worker Adjustment and Retraining Act, immigration-related obligations, and more.

The tech industry’s recent woes serve as a reminder that the weather can turn quickly – and to be compliant and careful when conducting RIFs. Counsel can assist you from planning to execution and beyond.

This blog is made available by Foley & Lardner LLP (“Foley” or “the Firm”) for informational purposes only. It is not meant to convey the Firm’s legal position on behalf of any client, nor is it intended to convey specific legal advice. Any opinions expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the views of Foley & Lardner LLP, its partners, or its clients. Accordingly, do not act upon this information without seeking counsel from a licensed attorney. This blog is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Communicating with Foley through this website by email, blog post, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship for any legal matter. Therefore, any communication or material you transmit to Foley through this blog, whether by email, blog post or any other manner, will not be treated as confidential or proprietary. The information on this blog is published “AS IS” and is not guaranteed to be complete, accurate, and or up-to-date. Foley makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, as to the operation or content of the site. Foley expressly disclaims all other guarantees, warranties, conditions and representations of any kind, either express or implied, whether arising under any statute, law, commercial use or otherwise, including implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Foley or any of its partners, officers, employees, agents or affiliates be liable, directly or indirectly, under any theory of law (contract, tort, negligence or otherwise), to you or anyone else, for any claims, losses or damages, direct, indirect special, incidental, punitive or consequential, resulting from or occasioned by the creation, use of or reliance on this site (including information and other content) or any third party websites or the information, resources or material accessed through any such websites. In some jurisdictions, the contents of this blog may be considered Attorney Advertising. If applicable, please note that prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Photographs are for dramatization purposes only and may include models. Likenesses do not necessarily imply current client, partnership or employee status.

Related Services

Insights

2023 M&A Outlook
05 December 2022
Foley Ignite
COVID-related Form I-9 Remote Verification Flexibilities Extended Through July 31, 2023
05 December 2022
Labor & Employment Law Perspectives
Learnings from Recent Physician Practice Private Equity Transactions
05 December 2022
Health Care Law Today
Get up to Speed: Blockchain for the Auto Industry
05 December 2022
Dashboard Insights
What You Should Know About Payor/Provider Convergence
25-26 January 2023
Los Angeles, CA
ATA EDGE2022 Policy Conference | American Telemedicine Association
7-9 December 2022
Washington, D.C.
CLE Weeks
5-16 December 2022
Milwaukee, WI
Foley Sponsors Ernst & Young Entrepreneur of the Year® Program
1 December 2021 - 30 November 2022
Michigan and Northwest Ohio Region