‘You are my Employer, not the Thought Police’ – Employee Online Activity in a Time of Turmoil

08 June 2020 Labor & Employment Law Perspectives Blog
Authors: Krista M. Cabrera

A number of outlets have reported that social media use has significantly increased during the COVID-19 pandemic, as many are quarantined at home with time to kill.  Meanwhile, just as social media use has spiked, the circumstances of George Floyd’s death have led to daily protests throughout the nation.  In the midst of this perfect storm – as Americans take to their smartphones, tablets, and laptops to argue their views on complex societal concerns, a tricky issue has presented itself to employers – what to do if an employee posts racist or other objectionable content on his or her social media feed?      

There are several issues at play with this quandary.  First and foremost, as we have previously reported, in contrast to public-sector workplaces, private employers are not bound by the First Amendment’s right to free speech.  Public-sector employers have to tread more cautiously in dealing with employee expression issues.  Unlike their public-sector counterparts, employees in the private sector do not have “free speech rights” at work as a general proposition.  Nevertheless, as a best practice, employers should limit disciplinary action, including termination, for online conduct to scenarios in which the conduct violates the employer’s articulated policies.  To that end, employers should ensure that the company’s anti-harassment policy specifically applies to online conduct, including postings on social media.  Likewise, in this day and age, all companies should have social media policies that incorporate the company’s anti-harassment policy.  If your company has a code of conduct, online conduct should be addressed there as well. 

In addition to having policies that prohibit discrimination or harassment online, companies must enforce these policies consistently.  In other words, if an employer learns that an employee used a racial slur online and disciplines the employee for this conduct, the employer will need to act consistently in similar situations that involve potentially discriminatory or harassing conduct.  Likewise, an employer that has a history of terminating employees for obscenity, but does not similarly punish employees who disseminate racist statements (either online or in the physical workplace), may find itself on the receiving end of a discrimination claim. 

Finally, depending on location, there are also state laws to consider when taking action against an employee for a social media post.  For example, in some states, “political affiliation” is a protected class, and thus, employers must be careful that the offensive post is not directly tied to an employee’s political affiliation.  Likewise, some states prohibit terminating an employee for lawful off-duty conduct. Online speech that attacks a protected class or constitutes actionable harassment, however, would not fall into that category.   

These are tricky issues, often directly impacting an organization’s core values.  In addition to potential legal liability, an employer’s approach to an objectionable employee posting can have wide-ranging effects in terms of employee morale and public perception.  A decision regarding whether and how to best respond should be taken carefully, and should take all of these considerations into account, including the advice of legal counsel.

This blog is made available by Foley & Lardner LLP (“Foley” or “the Firm”) for informational purposes only. It is not meant to convey the Firm’s legal position on behalf of any client, nor is it intended to convey specific legal advice. Any opinions expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the views of Foley & Lardner LLP, its partners, or its clients. Accordingly, do not act upon this information without seeking counsel from a licensed attorney. This blog is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Communicating with Foley through this website by email, blog post, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship for any legal matter. Therefore, any communication or material you transmit to Foley through this blog, whether by email, blog post or any other manner, will not be treated as confidential or proprietary. The information on this blog is published “AS IS” and is not guaranteed to be complete, accurate, and or up-to-date. Foley makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, as to the operation or content of the site. Foley expressly disclaims all other guarantees, warranties, conditions and representations of any kind, either express or implied, whether arising under any statute, law, commercial use or otherwise, including implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Foley or any of its partners, officers, employees, agents or affiliates be liable, directly or indirectly, under any theory of law (contract, tort, negligence or otherwise), to you or anyone else, for any claims, losses or damages, direct, indirect special, incidental, punitive or consequential, resulting from or occasioned by the creation, use of or reliance on this site (including information and other content) or any third party websites or the information, resources or material accessed through any such websites. In some jurisdictions, the contents of this blog may be considered Attorney Advertising. If applicable, please note that prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Photographs are for dramatization purposes only and may include models. Likenesses do not necessarily imply current client, partnership or employee status.

Related Services