“No-Fault” Attendance Policies Now Unlawful in New York: What Should Employers Do?

28 November 2022 Labor & Employment Law Perspectives Blog
Author(s): Scott T. Allen

Last week, New York State enacted legislation that bans “no-fault” attendance policies. The new law, which will take effect in 90 days, prohibits employers from penalizing workers based on “use of any legally protected absence pursuant to federal, local, or state law,” and clarifies that assessing attendance points (or taking similar actions such as issuing demerits/occurrences or deducting from a time bank) constitutes retaliation under the law.  (Lawmakers’ written justification for the law contends that no-fault attendance policies discourage workers from taking protected leave and fail to inform them of their rights.)

This development may come as a surprise to employers in industries where no-fault attendance policies are common, including in union settings.  Such policies generally involve employees accruing “points” or “occurrences” when they are late or miss work, with certain exceptions for vacation, job-protected leave including under the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) and Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), and other approved time off.  Such policies are simple for employers to administer and also reduce burdens on workers by eliminating the need to obtain doctor’s notes and other documentation for absences.

We have previously discussed how no-fault attendance policies should deal with FMLA absences, as well as the extent to which absences due to COVID-19 may qualify as disability leave under the ADA that would warrant an exception to such policies.  As a reminder, attendance policies must treat FMLA leave absences comparable to other forms of leave.  For example, under EEOC guidance, employers must generally modify no-fault attendance policies to provide employees additional leave when necessary to accommodate a disabled employee.  However, while noting that certain exceptions are required, courts have generally upheld no-fault attendance policies as lawful.

New York’s law goes further than the existing protections by declaring that the issuance of any attendance points (or equivalents) for protected absences constitutes retaliation, even when such points do not result in discipline or termination.  Accordingly, New York employers must consider exceptions for any and all absences that result in attendance points to workers, and not only when they receive formal discipline as a result.

Whether in New York or elsewhere, employers with no-fault attendance policies should review their handbooks and consider applicable state or local laws that may conflict with such policies.  Attendance policies that cover New York employees, including those who work remotely, must now clarify that no attendance points (or equivalents) will be issued when workers take protected leave under federal, state, or local law.

This blog is made available by Foley & Lardner LLP (“Foley” or “the Firm”) for informational purposes only. It is not meant to convey the Firm’s legal position on behalf of any client, nor is it intended to convey specific legal advice. Any opinions expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the views of Foley & Lardner LLP, its partners, or its clients. Accordingly, do not act upon this information without seeking counsel from a licensed attorney. This blog is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Communicating with Foley through this website by email, blog post, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship for any legal matter. Therefore, any communication or material you transmit to Foley through this blog, whether by email, blog post or any other manner, will not be treated as confidential or proprietary. The information on this blog is published “AS IS” and is not guaranteed to be complete, accurate, and or up-to-date. Foley makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, as to the operation or content of the site. Foley expressly disclaims all other guarantees, warranties, conditions and representations of any kind, either express or implied, whether arising under any statute, law, commercial use or otherwise, including implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Foley or any of its partners, officers, employees, agents or affiliates be liable, directly or indirectly, under any theory of law (contract, tort, negligence or otherwise), to you or anyone else, for any claims, losses or damages, direct, indirect special, incidental, punitive or consequential, resulting from or occasioned by the creation, use of or reliance on this site (including information and other content) or any third party websites or the information, resources or material accessed through any such websites. In some jurisdictions, the contents of this blog may be considered Attorney Advertising. If applicable, please note that prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Photographs are for dramatization purposes only and may include models. Likenesses do not necessarily imply current client, partnership or employee status.

Author(s)

Related Services