Kelsey C. Boehm
Consejero Senior
Kelsey Boehm is a litigation senior counsel at Foley & Lardner LLP, who assists Foley’s clients in a wide array of complex commercial litigation matters including class action defense, contract disputes, securities matters, and intellectual property litigation. Kelsey also has experience advising clients in connection with government investigations and regarding accounting related issues. Kelsey gains clients’ trust by gaining a full understanding of their business objectives and informing practical legal strategies tailored to their specific needs.
Kelsey has substantial experience advising clients in the food and beverage, fashion and beauty, health care, and automotive industries. She has secured favorable results for clients across all phases of litigation, including pleading stage, discovery, summary judgment, mediation, arbitration and trials, and appeals.
Kelsey is recognized not only for her strengths as a lawyer, but for her willingness to tackle difficult cases, volunteer in the community, and as an advocate for diversity in the legal profession.
Experiencia representativa
- Defend various food and product packaging companies against claims of false advertising and improper labeling
- Represented various public and private companies in cases involving securities fraud violations and disclosure issues
- Represented a health care company during a month-long arbitration hearing, which resulted in a judicial confirmation of a final award in excess of $285,000,000 for Foley’s client
- Represented reinsurance companies in arbitration hearings, including prevailing on behalf of a ceding company in a multimillion-dollar arbitration involving rate increases under yearly renewable term life-insurance contracts
- Represented public company under SEC investigation involving revenue recognition and executive compensation issues
- Represent numerous automobile and food manufacturers in cases involving breach of contract and warranty claims
- Represent chief executive officer and chief financial officer in securities class action involving fraud claims and disclosure issues
- Represent clients in environmental litigation, including nuisance suits brought by private landowners relating to groundwater contamination and noxious odors
- Represent medical instrument manufacturers in patent infringement cases
- Represent e-Commerce companies in intellectual property disputes
- Defend retailers against claims that product labels were false and misleading
- Represent clients in administrative proceedings relating to various issues such as environmental permits and Medicaid audits
Premios y reconocimientos
- Received, Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch recognition for Commercial Litigation (2024-2025)
Afiliaciones profesionales
- Associate Advisory Board Member, Legal Aid Foundation of Colorado
- Infrastructure Committee Member, Denver Metro Chamber of Commerce
- Member, Colorado Bar Association
- Member, Association for Women Lawyers
/Passle/67195fd3e9093d25035607af/SearchServiceImages/2025-06-30-16-44-47-029-6862beff000ef5f3a4163f92.jpg)
El Tribunal Supremo vuelve a controlar el poder de las agencias: Lo que McKesson significa para los litigios TCPA
El Tribunal Supremo ha señalado recientemente un nuevo alejamiento de la deferencia judicial hacia las resoluciones administrativas. La cuestión de si...
Foley FAB lanza Las leyes de la moda: Lo que estará de moda en 2025
Nuestro equipo se compromete a mantenerse a la vanguardia: nuestras Leyes de la moda: What's Trending in 2025 se sumerge en la jurisprudencia más reciente, destaca los casos clave a seguir y proporciona información sobre tendencias impactantes y retos emergentes. Hemos elaborado esta guía para ayudarle a navegar tanto por las oportunidades como por las incertidumbres que se avecinan.
No Harm, No Foul: Desestimada la demanda por lavado verde por falta de legitimación al amparo del artículo III
Está bien establecido que, en virtud del artículo III de la Constitución, los tribunales federales de los Estados Unidos se limitan a juzgar "casos y controversias".
Ninth Circuit Precedent Limits Fraud-Based Label Claims
It is well-settled that fraud-based claims asserted in federal court need to satisfy not only Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6)’s plausibility pleading standard but also the heightened pleading requirements of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 9(b).
Foley consigue una victoria para Del Monte en el Noveno Circuito en un litigio sobre etiquetado
Foley & Lardner LLP representó con éxito a Del Monte Foods en la obtención de una victoria ante el Tribunal de Apelaciones del Noveno Circuito, que confirmó la desestimación de una demanda colectiva que acusaba a Del Monte de publicidad engañosa mediante prácticas de etiquetado engañosas. La demanda, presentada en California por un consumidor de Oregón, alegaba que Del Monte comercializaba falsamente sus vasos de fruta como "naturales" a pesar de contener conservantes sintéticos.
Los tribunales de distrito aplican el precedente del Noveno Circuito para desestimar las demandas por etiquetado engañoso.
El Tribunal de Apelaciones del Noveno Circuito emitió recientemente tres decisiones dignas de mención en las que sostiene que los tribunales pueden considerar la información que figura en la parte posterior o lateral de las etiquetas de los productos de consumo para aclarar cualquier lenguaje ambiguo en las etiquetas frontales al considerar si las reclamaciones de protección al consumidor son plausibles en la etapa de alegatos.